|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03315cam a22002894i 4500 |
001 |
16209047 |
003 |
GR-PaULI |
005 |
20210117210150.0 |
008 |
100429s2010 enk f 001 0 eng d |
020 |
|
|
|a 9780521896313
|q (hbk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0521896312
|q (hbk.)
|
040 |
|
|
|a DLC
|b gre
|c DLC
|d YDX
|d BTCTA
|d YDXCP
|d BWK
|d CDX
|d UKM
|d BWX
|d COO
|d RCE
|d GR-PaULI
|d DLC
|e AACR2
|
082 |
0 |
0 |
|a 160
|2 22
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Castagnoli, Luca,
|d 1975-
|9 156053
|e συγγραφέας
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Ancient self-refutation :
|b the logic and history of the self-refutation argument from Democritus to Augustine /
|c Luca Castagnoli.
|
260 |
|
|
|a Cambridge, UK :
|b Cambridge University Press,
|c 2010.
|
300 |
|
|
|a xx, 394 σ. :
|c 24 εκ.
|
504 |
|
|
|a Περιλαμβάνει βιβλιογραφία και ευρετήριο.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a Machine generated contents note: Introduction; Part I. Truth, Falsehood and Self-Refutation: 1. Preliminaries; 2. A modern approach: Mackie on the absolute self-refutation of 'nothing is true'; 3. Setting the ancient stage: Dissoi Logoi 4.6; 4. Self-refutation and dialectic: Plato; 5. Speaking to Antiphasis: Aristotle; 6. Introducing peritroph: Sextus Empiricus; 7. Augustine's turn; 8. Interim conclusions; Part II. Pragmatic, Ad Hominem and Operational Self-Refutation: 9. Epicurus against the determinist: blame and reversal; 10. Anti-sceptical dilemmas: pragmatic or ad hominem self-refutations?; 11. Must we philosophise? Aristotle's protreptic argument; 12. Augustine's 'Si fallor, sum': how to prove one's existence by Consequentia Mirabilis; 13. A step back: operational self-refutations in Plato; Part III. Scepticism and Self-Refutation: 14. Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism: Sextus Empiricus; 15. Scepticism and self-refutation: looking backwards; Conclusion.
|
520 |
|
|
|a "A 'self-refutation argument' is any argument which aims at showing that (and how) a certain thesis is self-refuting. This is the first book-length treatment of ancient self-refutation and provides a unified account of what is distinctive in the ancient approach to the self-refutation argument, on the basis of close philological, logical and historical analysis of a variety of sources. It examines the logic, force, and prospects of this original style of argumentation within the context of ancient philosophical debates, dispelling various misconceptions concerning its nature and purpose and elucidating some important differences which exist both within the ancient approach to self-refutation and between that approach, as a whole, and some modern counterparts of it. In providing a comprehensive account of ancient self-refutation, the book advances our understanding of influential and debated texts and arguments from philosophers like Democritus, Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, the Stoics, the Academic sceptics, the Pyrrhonists and Augustine"--
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Συλλογιστική
|9 134404
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|9 156054
|a Αναίρεση (Λογική)
|
856 |
4 |
2 |
|3 Cover image
|u http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/96313/cover/9780521896313.jpg
|
942 |
|
|
|2 ddc
|c BK15
|
952 |
|
|
|0 0
|1 0
|2 ddc
|4 0
|6 160_000000000000000_CAS
|7 0
|9 204451
|a PHIL
|b PHIL
|d 2016-07-28
|i 11348
|l 1
|o 160 CAS
|p 025000186026
|r 2021-09-17 00:00:00
|s 2021-09-09
|t 1
|v 2016.00
|w 2016-07-28
|y BK15
|
998 |
|
|
|c ΚΑΝΕΛΛΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ
|d 2016-07
|
999 |
|
|
|c 124453
|d 124453
|