Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics A Twenty-Year Retrospective and Critical Appraisal /

Papers presented at a symposium on philosophy and medicine at the Institute for the Medical Humanities at the University of Texas Medical Branch in 1974 were published in the inaugural volume of this series. To help celebrate more than 20 years of extraordinary success with the series, another sympo...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Carson, Ronald A. (Επιμελητής έκδοσης), Burns, Chester R. (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1997.
Σειρά:Philosophy and Medicine ; 50
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 04537nam a22005055i 4500
001 978-0-306-48133-8
003 DE-He213
005 20151204175700.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s1997 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780306481338  |9 978-0-306-48133-8 
024 7 |a 10.1007/0-306-48133-2  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a R723-723.7 
072 7 |a HP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a MED050000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 610.1  |2 23 
245 1 0 |a Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Twenty-Year Retrospective and Critical Appraisal /  |c edited by Ronald A. Carson, Chester R. Burns. 
264 1 |a Dordrecht :  |b Springer Netherlands,  |c 1997. 
300 |a XVII, 341 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Philosophy and Medicine ;  |v 50 
505 0 |a History and Theory -- Bioethics as an Interdisciplinary Enterprise: Where Does Ethics Fit in the Mosaic of Disciplines? -- Humanities in the Service of Medicine: Three Models -- The Primacy of Practice: Medicine and Postmodernism -- What can the Epistemologists Learn from the Endocrinologists? Or is the Philosophy of Medicine Based on a Mistake? -- Praxis as a Keystone for the Philosophy and Professional Ethics of Medicine: The Need for an Arch-Support: Commentary on Toulmin and Wartofsky -- Bioethics and the Philosophy of Medicine Reconsidered -- Form Synthesis and System to Morals and Procedure: The Development of Philosophy of Medicine -- The Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics: Commentary on Ten Have and Engelhardt -- Practice and Theory -- Bioethics in Social Context -- The Week of November Seventh: Bioethics as a Practice -- Toward A Humanist Bioethics: Commentary on Churchill and Andre -- Medical Ethics as Reflective Practice -- From Principles to Reflective Practice or Narrative Ethics? Commentary on Carson -- Hedgehogs and Hermaphrodites: Toward a More Anthropological Bioethics -- An Anthropological Bioethics: Hermeneutical or Critical? Commentary on Elliott -- Medicine’s Challenge to Relativism: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation -- “We be of One Blood, You and I”: Commentary on Kopelman -- Must Patients Suffer? -- Doctors and Their Suffering Patients: Commentary on Campbell -- Policy -- Whatever Happened to Research Ethics? -- What’s Happening in Reserach Ethics? Commentary on Brody -- At the Intersection of Medicine, Law, Economics, and Ethics: Bioethics and the Art of Intellectual Cross-Dressing -- Intellectual Cross-Dressing: An Eccentricity or A practical Necessity? Commentary on Morreim. 
520 |a Papers presented at a symposium on philosophy and medicine at the Institute for the Medical Humanities at the University of Texas Medical Branch in 1974 were published in the inaugural volume of this series. To help celebrate more than 20 years of extraordinary success with the series, another symposium was convened in Galveston in 1995. The convenors asked the participants these questions: In what ways and to what ends have academic humanists and medical scientists and practitioners become serious conversation partners in recent years? How have their dialogues been shaped by prevailing social views, political philosophies, academic habits, professional mores, and public pressures? What have been the key concepts and questions of these dialogues? Have the dialogues made any appreciable intellectual or social difference? Have they improved the care of the sick? Authors respond from a variety of theoretical perspectives in the humanities. They also articulate conceptions of philosophy of medicine and bioethics from various practice experiences, and bring critical attention to aspects of the contemporary health policy. 
650 0 |a Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Ethics. 
650 0 |a Medicine  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Medical ethics. 
650 1 4 |a Philosophy. 
650 2 4 |a Philosophy of Medicine. 
650 2 4 |a Theory of Medicine/Bioethics. 
650 2 4 |a Ethics. 
700 1 |a Carson, Ronald A.  |e editor. 
700 1 |a Burns, Chester R.  |e editor. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9780792335450 
830 0 |a Philosophy and Medicine ;  |v 50 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48133-2  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
912 |a ZDB-2-BAE 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)