The Particulate Air Pollution Controversy A Case Study and Lessons Learned /

Small invisible particles in the urban air, especially those produced by human activities, have recently stimulated intense scrutiny, debate, regulation, and legal proceedings. The stakes are high, both with respect to health impacts and economic costs, and the methods used previously to resolve sim...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Phalen, Robert F. (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Boston, MA : Springer US, 2002.
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 03197nam a22004935i 4500
001 978-0-306-48208-3
003 DE-He213
005 20151204171130.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2002 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780306482083  |9 978-0-306-48208-3 
024 7 |a 10.1007/b101883  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a TD881-890 
072 7 |a RNP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a SCI026000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 363.7392  |2 23 
100 1 |a Phalen, Robert F.  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Particulate Air Pollution Controversy  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Case Study and Lessons Learned /  |c by Robert F. Phalen. 
264 1 |a Boston, MA :  |b Springer US,  |c 2002. 
300 |a XIV, 128 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 |a Harmful Effects of Particulate Air Pollution -- Historical Overview -- Interpreting the PM Epidemiology -- The Nature of Urban Particulate Matter -- The Fates of Inhaled Particles -- The Toxicology of Particulate Material -- Research Needs -- What’s at Stake? -- Challenges to Dogma -- Conclusions and Recommendations. 
520 |a Small invisible particles in the urban air, especially those produced by human activities, have recently stimulated intense scrutiny, debate, regulation, and legal proceedings. The stakes are high, both with respect to health impacts and economic costs, and the methods used previously to resolve similar issues are no longer adequate. Everyone on earth inhales thousands to millions of particles in each breath, so if urban particulate air pollution—particulate matter (PM)—is significantly hazardous, the negative impact on health could be staggering. Yet the activities that generate PM, such as farming, manufacturing, mining, transportation, and generating electricity, are themselves essential to human health and welfare. Scientists, regulators, legislators, activists, judges, lawyers, journalists, and representatives of the business community are actively involved in addressing the question of what should be done. This complex issue presents opportunities for critically assessing the relevant knowledge and for adopting more rigorous approaches to this and similar problems. What is the PM controversy, and why is it a good case study for how science and public policy might better interface? The PM controversy is the sum of the frequently heated debates related to the potential health risks from urban PM. 
650 0 |a Environment. 
650 0 |a Public health. 
650 0 |a Epidemiology. 
650 0 |a Ecotoxicology. 
650 0 |a Air pollution. 
650 1 4 |a Environment. 
650 2 4 |a Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution. 
650 2 4 |a Ecotoxicology. 
650 2 4 |a Public Health. 
650 2 4 |a Epidemiology. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9781402072253 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b101883  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-EES 
912 |a ZDB-2-BAE 
950 |a Earth and Environmental Science (Springer-11646)