Contextualisms in Epistemology
Contextualism has become one of the leading paradigms in contemporary epistemology. According to this view, there is no context-independent standard of knowledge, and as a result, all knowledge ascriptions are context-sensitive. Contextualists contend that their account of this analysis allows us to...
| Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
|---|---|
| Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | , |
| Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Έκδοση: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands,
2005.
|
| Θέματα: | |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- Contextualist Approaches to Epistemology: Problems and Prospects
- Externalism and Modest Contextualism
- Skepticism, Information, and Closure: Dretske’s Theory of Knowledge
- What’s Wrong with Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox
- Contextualism and the Skeptic: Comments on Engel
- How to Be an Anti-Skeptic and a Noncontextualist
- Are Knowledge Claims Indexical?
- In Defense of Indexicalism: Comments on Davis
- Keeping the Conversational Score: Constraints for an Optimal Contextualist Answer?
- Knowledge, Reflection and Sceptical Hypotheses
- Inferential Contextualism, Epistemological Realism and Scepticism: Comments on Williams
- Epistemic Contextualism
- Why Epistemic Contextualism Does Not Provide an Adequate Account of Knowledge: Comments on Barke
- A Different Sort of Contextualism
- On the Prospects for Virtue Contextualism: Comments on Greco
- Lotteries and Contexts
- Reply to Baumann
- Defeasibility and the Normative Grasp of Context
- Moral Particularism and Epistemic Contextualism: Comments on Lance and Little
- Stability, Strength and Sensitivity: Converting Belief into Knowledge
- The Stability Theory of Knowledge and Belief Revision: Comments on Rott.
