|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03376nam a22004815i 4500 |
001 |
978-1-4020-4713-8 |
003 |
DE-He213 |
005 |
20151111191603.0 |
007 |
cr nn 008mamaa |
008 |
100301s2006 ne | s |||| 0|eng d |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781402047138
|9 978-1-4020-4713-8
|
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1007/1-4020-4713-4
|2 doi
|
040 |
|
|
|d GrThAP
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a B67
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a PDA
|2 bicssc
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a SCI075000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 501
|2 23
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Ginev, Dimitri.
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Context of Constitution
|h [electronic resource] :
|b Beyond the Edge of Epistemological Justification /
|c by Dimitri Ginev.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Dordrecht :
|b Springer Netherlands,
|c 2006.
|
300 |
|
|
|a X, 258 p.
|b online resource.
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
347 |
|
|
|a text file
|b PDF
|2 rda
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Ideas for the situatedtranscendence of scientific research -- Reformulating the concept of “normal science” in the framework of hermeneutic phenomenology -- Hermeneutic phenomenology of scientific research -- The normativity of normal science: hermeneutic contextualism and proto-normativity.
|
520 |
|
|
|a This study brings together ideas developed over many years in various lectures in an endeavour to clarify the concept of hermeneutic fore-structure of scientific research. The starting point of my investigations was the outline of an interp- tative approach to the constitution of science’s cognitive content. In the late 1970s I was preoccupied with a question that nowadays should be formulated as follows: Is it possible to claim a validity of the hermeneutic view of the “situatedness in a tradition” also for the natural sciences? I was convinced that the negative answer implies a self-defeating position. It states that in order to champion the (cultural) universality of hermeneutics, one has to profess the non-hermeneutic nature of the natural sciences. Paradoxically enough, this a- wer presupposes a sharp dividing line (between dialogical experience and monological research) in culture in order to stress the universality of hermeneutics. Long before the period of perestroika in my corner, I learned from Joseph Kockelmans, Patrick Heelan, and Theodore Kisiel how the universalization of hermeneutics can include the natural sciences without ignoring their cognitive specificity. Somewhat later, in the aftermath of the discussions over the “finalization of science”, I began to confront the view that it would be a kind of trivializing the struggle for a philosophical hermeneutics if the theory-observation nexus is treated as a specific hermeneutic circle. No doubt, the view is correct. I was, however, dissatisfied with the way of arguing for it.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Philosophy.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a History.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Science.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Philosophy and science.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Phenomenology.
|
650 |
1 |
4 |
|a Philosophy.
|
650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Philosophy of Science.
|
650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Science, general.
|
650 |
2 |
4 |
|a History of Science.
|
650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Phenomenology.
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a SpringerLink (Online service)
|
773 |
0 |
|
|t Springer eBooks
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Printed edition:
|z 9781402047121
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4713-4
|z Full Text via HEAL-Link
|
912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-2-SHU
|
950 |
|
|
|a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)
|