Animal Welfare Competing Conceptions and Their Ethical Implications /

Members of the “animal welfare science community”, which includes both scientists and philosophers, have illegitimately appropriated the concept of animal welfare by claiming to have given a scientific account of it that is more objectively valid than the more “sentimental” account given by animal l...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Haynes, Richard P. (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2008.
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
  • The Science of Laboratory Animal Care and Welfare
  • The Roots for the Emerging Science of Animal Welfare in Great Britain
  • The Historical Roots of the Science of Laboratory Animal Welfare in the US
  • Laboratory Animal Welfare Issues in the US Legislative and Regulatory History
  • Mandated Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees
  • Do Regulators of Animal Welfare Need to Develop a Theory of Psychological Well-Being?
  • Conclusion
  • The Emergence of the Science of Food Animal Welfare Mandated by the Brambell Commission Report
  • Rollin’s Theory of Animal Welfare and Its Ethical Implications
  • Duncan and the Inclusion of Subjectivity
  • Fraser on Animal Welfare, Science, and Ethics
  • Appleby-Sandøe and the Human Welfare Model
  • Nordenfelt and Nussbaum on Animal Welfare
  • Conclusion to Part II
  • Giving Animals What We Owe Them
  • to Part III
  • The Fair Deal Argument
  • A General Theory of Our Moral Obligations to Nonhuman Animals
  • Conclusion: Competing Conceptions of Animal Welfare.