Going Amiss In Experimental Research
Like any goal-oriented procedure, experiment is subject to many kinds of failures. These failures have a variety of features, depending on the particulars of their sources. For the experimenter these pitfalls should be avoided and their effects minimized. For the historian-philosopher of science and...
| Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
|---|---|
| Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | , , |
| Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Έκδοση: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands,
2009.
|
| Σειρά: | Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science ;
267 |
| Θέματα: | |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- Introduction: Mapping “Going Amiss”
- Introduction: Mapping “Going Amiss”
- Error as an Object of Study
- Error: The Long Neglect, the One-Sided View, and a Typology
- Error as Historiographical Challenge: The Infamous Globule Hypothesis
- Learning From Error
- Learning Without Error
- Living Extremely Flat: The Life of an Automaton; John von Neumann’s Conception of Error of (in)Animate Systems
- Concepts and Dead Ends
- Experimental Reorientations
- Concepts from the Bench: Hans Krebs, Kurt Henseleit and the Urea Cycle
- How Experiments Make Concepts Fail: Faraday and Magnetic Curves
- A Pioneer Who Never Got It Right: James Dewar and the Elusive Phenomena of Cold
- Instrumental Artifacts
- Distinguishing Real Results from Instrumental Artifacts: The Case of the Missing Rain
- Going Right and Making It Wrong: The Reception of Fizeau’s Ether-Drift Experiment of 1859
- The Spectrum of ? Decay: Continuous or Discrete? A Variety of Errors in Experimental Investigation
- Surprise and Puzzlement
- The Scent of Filth: Experiments, Waste, and the Set-Up
- In the Thick of Organic Matter.
