A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency

This SpringerBrief proposes a general framework for reasoning about inconsistency in a wide variety of logics, including inconsistency resolution methods that have not yet been studied.  The proposed framework allows users to specify preferences on how to resolve inconsistency when there are multipl...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Martinez, Maria Vanina (Συγγραφέας), Molinaro, Cristian (Συγγραφέας), Subrahmanian, V.S (Συγγραφέας), Amgoud, Leila (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: New York, NY : Springer New York : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
Σειρά:SpringerBriefs in Computer Science,
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 03051nam a22005895i 4500
001 978-1-4614-6750-2
003 DE-He213
005 20151204142319.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130321s2013 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781461467502  |9 978-1-4614-6750-2 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-1-4614-6750-2  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a Q334-342 
050 4 |a TJ210.2-211.495 
072 7 |a UYQ  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a TJFM1  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a COM004000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 006.3  |2 23 
100 1 |a Martinez, Maria Vanina.  |e author. 
245 1 2 |a A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency  |h [electronic resource] /  |c by Maria Vanina Martinez, Cristian Molinaro, V.S. Subrahmanian, Leila Amgoud. 
264 1 |a New York, NY :  |b Springer New York :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2013. 
300 |a VII, 45 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a SpringerBriefs in Computer Science,  |x 2191-5768 
505 0 |a Introduction and Preliminary Concepts -- A General Framework for Handling Inconsistency -- Algorithms -- Handling Inconsistency in Monotonic Logics -- Link with Existing Approaches -- Conclusions. 
520 |a This SpringerBrief proposes a general framework for reasoning about inconsistency in a wide variety of logics, including inconsistency resolution methods that have not yet been studied.  The proposed framework allows users to specify preferences on how to resolve inconsistency when there are multiple ways to do so. This empowers users to resolve inconsistency in data leveraging both their detailed knowledge of the data as well as their application needs. The brief shows that the framework is well-suited to handle inconsistency in several logics, and provides algorithms to compute preferred options. Finally, the brief shows that the framework not only captures several existing works, but also supports reasoning about inconsistency in several logics for which no such methods exist today. 
650 0 |a Computer science. 
650 0 |a Computer logic. 
650 0 |a Mathematical logic. 
650 0 |a Database management. 
650 0 |a Data mining. 
650 0 |a Artificial intelligence. 
650 1 4 |a Computer Science. 
650 2 4 |a Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics). 
650 2 4 |a Database Management. 
650 2 4 |a Logics and Meanings of Programs. 
650 2 4 |a Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 
650 2 4 |a Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages. 
700 1 |a Molinaro, Cristian.  |e author. 
700 1 |a Subrahmanian, V.S.  |e author. 
700 1 |a Amgoud, Leila.  |e author. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9781461467496 
830 0 |a SpringerBriefs in Computer Science,  |x 2191-5768 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6750-2  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SCS 
950 |a Computer Science (Springer-11645)