Bioethics in Law

The idea for Bioethics in Law began more than a decade ago, while I was studying social science and law. I was parti- larly interested in the collaborations that comprised social s- ence in law. Economic and social data in the pioneering Brandeis brief had been used to defend an early 20th-century l...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Spielman, Bethany J. (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Totowa, NJ : Humana Press, 2007.
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 02695nam a22004455i 4500
001 978-1-59745-295-3
003 DE-He213
005 20140518101518.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2007 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781597452953  |9 978-1-59745-295-3 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-1-59745-295-3  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a QH332 
050 4 |a R724-726.2 
072 7 |a PSAD  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a MB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a MED050000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 610.1  |2 23 
082 0 4 |a 174.2  |2 23 
100 1 |a Spielman, Bethany J.  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Bioethics in Law  |h [electronic resource] /  |c by Bethany J. Spielman. 
264 1 |a Totowa, NJ :  |b Humana Press,  |c 2007. 
300 |a 186 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 |a How Does Bioethics Help Judicial Reasoning? -- Health Care Ethics Committee Determinations -- Institutional Review Board Determinations -- Bioethics Commission Reports -- Bioethics Scholarship -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Conclusion. 
520 |a The idea for Bioethics in Law began more than a decade ago, while I was studying social science and law. I was parti- larly interested in the collaborations that comprised social s- ence in law. Economic and social data in the pioneering Brandeis brief had been used to defend an early 20th-century labor law; surveys of consumer confusion had helped resolve trademark - fringement cases; psychologists’ predictions of future violence had informed capital sentencing decisions. Additionally, Kenneth Clark’s “doll studies,” cited by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, had helped change the course of American 1 history. During that time, however, I was most intensely interested in bioethics, a relatively young field whose relationships to law had not been well analyzed. I wondered whether there could or should be a bioethics in law, because bioethics, unlike the social sciences, was not only in its infancy, but also had distinctly normative features, which might not mesh easily with law’s own normativity. 
650 0 |a Medicine. 
650 0 |a Medical ethics. 
650 1 4 |a Medicine & Public Health. 
650 2 4 |a Theory of Medicine/Bioethics. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9781588294340 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-295-3  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SME 
950 |a Medicine (Springer-11650)