Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /
This book deals with 20 voting procedures used or proposed for use in elections resulting in the choice of a single winner. These procedures are evaluated in terms of their ability to avoid five important paradoxes in a restricted domain, viz., when a Condorcet winner exists and is elected in the in...
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | , |
---|---|
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,
2019.
|
Έκδοση: | 1st ed. 2019. |
Σειρά: | SpringerBriefs in Economics,
|
Θέματα: | |
Διαθέσιμο Online: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- Introduction
- 20 Voting Procedures Designed to Elect a Single Candidate
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Lack of Monotonicity in a Restricted Domain
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Inconsistency Paradox (aka Reinforcement Paradox) in a Restricted Domain
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the No-Show Paradox in a Restricted Domain
- Which of the 20 Voting Procedures Satisfy or Violate the Subset Choice Condition (SCC) in a Restricted Domain?
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Preference Inversion Paradox in a Restricted Domain
- Summary.