Modern Turkey and the Armenian Genocide An Argument About the Meaning of the Past /

A number of highly informative books have been written about what is often called the "Armenian Genocide". This book, written by a political scientist, offers a different approach: It doesn’t concentrate on the past; it concentrates on the present, and shows how this past event is perceive...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Schrodt, Nikolaus (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2014.
Σειρά:Contributions to Political Science,
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 02644nam a22004815i 4500
001 978-3-319-04927-4
003 DE-He213
005 20151204145905.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 140607s2014 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783319049274  |9 978-3-319-04927-4 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-04927-4  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a JZ2-6530 
072 7 |a JPS  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a POL011000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 327  |2 23 
100 1 |a Schrodt, Nikolaus.  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Modern Turkey and the Armenian Genocide  |h [electronic resource] :  |b An Argument About the Meaning of the Past /  |c by Nikolaus Schrodt. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2014. 
300 |a XIII, 376 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Contributions to Political Science,  |x 2198-7289 
505 0 |a Preface -- Overview -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Theoretical Considerations -- 3 Research Design -- 4 The Arguments -- 5 Conclusions -- 6 Looking Forward -- 7 Appendices. 
520 |a A number of highly informative books have been written about what is often called the "Armenian Genocide". This book, written by a political scientist, offers a different approach: It doesn’t concentrate on the past; it concentrates on the present, and shows how this past event is perceived and discussed today. The idea is that the arguments deployed in this debate, those which allege that what happened amounts to genocide and those which deny this claim reveal something about cognitive structures of present agents, such as the Turkish government, as well as about the meaning and use of the term "genocide". Analyzing current positions and communication on this historical event thereby helps to illuminate present notions of identity, justice and interethnic coexistence. 
650 0 |a Political science. 
650 0 |a Political communication. 
650 0 |a International relations. 
650 0 |a Cultural studies. 
650 1 4 |a Political Science and International Relations. 
650 2 4 |a International Relations. 
650 2 4 |a Cultural Studies. 
650 2 4 |a Political Communication. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319049267 
830 0 |a Contributions to Political Science,  |x 2198-7289 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04927-4  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)