Heuristic Reasoning

How can we advance knowledge? Which methods do we need in order to make new discoveries? How can we rationally evaluate, reconstruct and offer discoveries as a means of improving the ‘method’ of discovery itself? And how can we use findings about scientific discovery to boost funding policies, thus...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Ippoliti, Emiliano (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2015.
Σειρά:Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 16
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 03242nam a22005415i 4500
001 978-3-319-09159-4
003 DE-He213
005 20151204190414.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 140905s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783319091594  |9 978-3-319-09159-4 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-09159-4  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a Q342 
072 7 |a UYQ  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a COM004000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 006.3  |2 23 
245 1 0 |a Heuristic Reasoning  |h [electronic resource] /  |c edited by Emiliano Ippoliti. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2015. 
300 |a V, 191 p. 11 illus., 1 illus. in color.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,  |x 2192-6255 ;  |v 16 
505 0 |a Reasoning at the frontier of knowledge: Introductory essay -- Why should the logic of discovery be revived? A reappraisal -- Are Heuristics Knowledge-Enhancing?Abduction, Models, and Fictions in Science -- Heuristic Appraisal at the Frontier of Research -- Why do Scientific Revolutions begin? -- Withstanding Tensions: Scientific Disagreement and Epistemic Tolerance -- Heuristics as Methods:  Validity, Reliability and Velocity -- Dynamic generation of hypotheses: Mandelbrot, Soros and Far-From-Equilibrium. 
520 |a How can we advance knowledge? Which methods do we need in order to make new discoveries? How can we rationally evaluate, reconstruct and offer discoveries as a means of improving the ‘method’ of discovery itself? And how can we use findings about scientific discovery to boost funding policies, thus fostering a deeper impact of scientific discovery itself? The respective chapters in this book provide readers with answers to these questions. They focus on a set of issues that are essential to the development of types of reasoning for advancing knowledge, such as models for both revolutionary findings and paradigm shifts; ways of rationally addressing scientific disagreement, e.g. when a revolutionary discovery sparks considerable disagreement inside the scientific community; frameworks for both discovery and inference methods; and heuristics for economics and the social sciences. 
650 0 |a Engineering. 
650 0 |a Operations research. 
650 0 |a Decision making. 
650 0 |a Epistemology. 
650 0 |a Logic. 
650 0 |a Philosophy and science. 
650 0 |a Computational intelligence. 
650 1 4 |a Engineering. 
650 2 4 |a Computational Intelligence. 
650 2 4 |a Philosophy of Science. 
650 2 4 |a Operation Research/Decision Theory. 
650 2 4 |a Logic. 
650 2 4 |a Epistemology. 
700 1 |a Ippoliti, Emiliano.  |e editor. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319091587 
830 0 |a Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,  |x 2192-6255 ;  |v 16 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09159-4  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-ENG 
950 |a Engineering (Springer-11647)