A Pragmatist Orientation for the Social Sciences in Climate Policy How to Make Integrated Economic Assessments Serve Society /
While economic and other social science expertise is indispensable for successful public policy-making regarding global climate change, social scientists face trade-offs between the scientific credibility, policy-relevance, and legitimacy of their policy advice. From a philosophical perspective, thi...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,
2016.
|
Σειρά: | Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,
323 |
Θέματα: | |
Διαθέσιμο Online: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- 1. Introduction
- Part I: The Key Challenge of Integrated Economic Advice for Climate Policy
- 2. The Need for an Integrated Economic Assessment of Climate Policy Options
- 3. Fundamental Perils for Scientific Assessments
- Part II: A Philosophical Evaluation of Normative Science-Policy Models
- 4. Prevalent Action-Guiding Models of Scientific Expertise in Policy
- 5. Fact/Value Conflation and the Danger of the Traditional Models
- 6. Pragmatism: Objectivity Despite Fact/Value Entanglement
- Part III: A Critical Look at the IPCC’s Economics
- 7. Understanding and Evaluating the IAM-based Economics
- 8. Ethics in Climate Economics: Balance or Bias?
- 9. Trust Them? The Epistemic Quality of Climate Economics
- 10. An Evaluation of the IPCC WG III Assessments
- Part IV: Towards Improved Integrated Economic Assessments for Climate Policy
- 11. Elements of a Guideline for Future Integrated Economic Assessments of the IPCC
- 12. Potential Implications of the IPCC Reform: Deliberative Learning and Difficulties of In-depth Policy Assessment. .