Was Ludwig von Mises a Conventionalist? A New Analysis of the Epistemology of the Austrian School of Economics /

Linsbichler’s erudite new book is not only an invitation for Austrian economists to reconsider their Misesian methodological foundations, but more importantly an attempt to bridge the methodological gap between the Austrian School and mainstream economics. His charitable reading of Mises provides th...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Linsbichler, Alexander (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 04917nam a22004695i 4500
001 978-3-319-46170-0
003 DE-He213
005 20170608151851.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 170608s2017 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783319461700  |9 978-3-319-46170-0 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-46170-0  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a HC10-1085 
072 7 |a KCZ  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a BUS069000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a SOC019000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 330.1509  |2 23 
100 1 |a Linsbichler, Alexander.  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Was Ludwig von Mises a Conventionalist?  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A New Analysis of the Epistemology of the Austrian School of Economics /  |c by Alexander Linsbichler. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing :  |b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,  |c 2017. 
300 |a IX, 151 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 |a 1. Introduction: The Austrian School of Economics between the Tea Party Movement and Academia -- 2. Mises and the Problem of Induction -- 3. Final Destination relativistic Historicism? -- 4. Praxeology as an Alleged Solution of the Problem of Induction -- 5. A Classification Scheme for Epistemological Positions -- 6. A Conventionalist Interpretation of Mises' Justification of the Fundamental Axiom -- 7. Praxeology as a conventionalist Research Program -- 8. Essentialism in the Austrian School -- 9. Recapitulation and Final Thoughts. 
520 |a Linsbichler’s erudite new book is not only an invitation for Austrian economists to reconsider their Misesian methodological foundations, but more importantly an attempt to bridge the methodological gap between the Austrian School and mainstream economics. His charitable reading of Mises provides the basis for an original conventionalist interpretation of Mises’ methodology, but it is most of all his anti-dogmatism, methodological openness and call for intellectual humility that stand out. —Erwin Dekker, Assistant Professor of Cultural Economics (Erasmus University Rotterdam) This book proposes new solutions to interpretational problems of Mises‘ methodological position. It also o­ffers a lucid and scholarly introduction to some important problems of the logic of science. Specialists and general readers alike will profit much from reading that book. —Karl Milford, Associate Professor in History of Economic Thought and Philosophy of Economics (University of Vienna) This innovative book challenges the mainstream reading of Ludwig von Mises as a contested “a priori” proponent of the Austrian School of economics. It o­ffers new insights to Mises’ methodology and epistemology by interpreting his praxeology as conventionalist. In doing so the author opens novel perspectives for contextualizing Ludwig von Mises’ work in the history of the Austrian School and the long term “Methodenstreit” since the 19th century. —Friedrich Stadler, Professor for History and Philosophy of Science (University of Vienna), Head and Director of the Institute Vienna Circle, President of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society This book presents a concise introduction to the epistemology and methodology of the Austrian School of economics as defended by Ludwig von Mises. The author provides an innovative interpretation of Mises’ arguments in favour of the a priori truth of praxeology, the received view of which contributed to the academic marginalization of the Austrian School. The study puts forward a unique argument that Mises – perhaps unintentionally – defends a form of conventionalism. Chapters in the book include detailed discussions of individualism, historicism, epistemological positions, and essentialism. The author goes on to discuss Mises’ justifi cation of the fundamental axiom and proposes a conventionalist interpretation. By presenting praxeology as a conventionalist research programme, the author aims at reinvigorating the interaction between the Austrian School, mainstream economics, and the philosophy of science. This comprehensive reconstruction is suitable for economists interested in the history and philosophy of their discipline, as well as for philosophers of science. 
650 0 |a Political economy. 
650 0 |a Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Philosophy and social sciences. 
650 1 4 |a Economics. 
650 2 4 |a History of Economic Thought/Methodology. 
650 2 4 |a Political Economy. 
650 2 4 |a Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 
650 2 4 |a History of Philosophy. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319461694 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46170-0  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-ECF 
950 |a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)