Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts

• Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
• Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Arcidiacono, Francesco (Επιμελητής έκδοσης), Bova, Antonio (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
• Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
• Γλώσσα: English
• Έκδοση: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2017.
• Θέματα: Education.; Language and education.; Educational psychology.; Education > Psychology.; Educational Psychology.; Professional & Vocational Education.; Language Education.

This book provides a comprehensive overview of empirical studies based on various approaches devoted to examining the interpersonal argumentative processes involved in different contexts. It also identifies context-dependent similarities and differences in the ways in which argumentative interaction...

Πίνακας περιεχομένων:

• Forewords, Clotilde Pontecorvo
• Interpersonal dynamics within argumentative interactions: An introduction, Francesco Arcidiacono, Antonio Bova
• Chapter 1. Inter-generational argumentation: Children’s account work during dinner conversations in Italy and Sweden, Franco Pauletto, Karin Aronsson, Francesco Arcidiacono
• Chapter 2. What can studying designed marital argument interventions contribute to argumentation scholarship? Harry Weger Jr
• Chapter 3. Reading together: The interplay between social and cognitive aspects in argumentative and non-argumentative dialogues, Nevena Buđevac, Francesco Arcidiacono, Aleksandar Baucal
• Chapter 4. The role of teacher in promoting argumentative interactions in the learning contexts of higher education, Antonio Bova
• Chapter 5. The epidemic effect of scaffolding argumentation in small groups to whole-class teacher-led argumentation, Baruch Schwarz, Irit Cohen, Yaakov Ophir
• Chapter 6. Processes of negotiation in socio-scientific argumentation about vegetarianism in teacher education, María Pilar Jiménez Aleixandre, Paolo Brocos
• Chapter 7. Argumentation and conflict management in online epistemic communities: A narrative approach to Wikipedia debates, Michael J. Baker, Françoise Détienne, Flore Barcellini
• Chapter 8. The interplay of argumentative dialogues and work observations in collective reflection for work transformation. Cross self-confrontations in a public health institution, Laure Kloetzer
• Chapter 9. “It may also be the case that you say I don’t want to do it”. Imaginary scenarios as resources to argue for treatment advice in cancer consultations, Francesca Alby, Marilena Fatigante, Cristina Zucchermaglio
• Chapter 10. Notes on similarities and differences in studying argumentation: A synthetic view, Antonio Bova, Francesco Arcidiacono
• Argumentation in dialogue: Final conclusions, Antonio Iannaccone, Francesco Arcidiacono.