Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes

This monograph studies voting procedures based on the probability that paradoxical outcomes like the famous Condorcet Paradox might exist. It is well known that hypothetical examples of many different paradoxical election outcomes can be developed, but this analysis examines factors that are related...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Gehrlein, William V. (Συγγραφέας), Lepelley, Dominique (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2017.
Σειρά:Studies in Choice and Welfare,
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 03294nam a22004935i 4500
001 978-3-319-64659-6
003 DE-He213
005 20171014200842.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 171014s2017 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783319646596  |9 978-3-319-64659-6 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-64659-6  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a HB846-HB846.8 
072 7 |a KCA  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a BUS069030  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 302.1  |2 23 
100 1 |a Gehrlein, William V.  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes  |h [electronic resource] /  |c by William V. Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2017. 
300 |a XIV, 183 p. 93 illus., 8 illus. in color.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Studies in Choice and Welfare,  |x 1614-0311 
505 0 |a Elections and Voting Paradoxes -- Probabilities of Voting Paradoxes -- Measures of Agreement in Voters’ Preferences -- Single-Stage Election Procedure -- Two-Stage Election Procedures -- The Impact of Voter Indifference -- Other Voting Rules and Considerations. 
520 |a This monograph studies voting procedures based on the probability that paradoxical outcomes like the famous Condorcet Paradox might exist. It is well known that hypothetical examples of many different paradoxical election outcomes can be developed, but this analysis examines factors that are related to the process by which voters form their preferences on candidates that will significantly reduce the likelihood that such voting paradoxes will ever actually be observed. It is found that extreme forms of voting paradoxes should be uncommon events with a small number of candidates. Another consideration is the propensity of common voting rules to elect the Condorcet Winner, which is widely accepted as the best choice as the winner, when it exists. All common voting rules are found to have identifiable scenarios for which they perform well on the basis of this criterion. But, Borda Rule is found to consistently work well at electing the Condorcet Winner, while the other voting rules have scenarios where they work poorly or have a very small likelihood of electing a different candidate than Borda Rule. The conclusions of previous theoretical work are presented in an expository format and they are validated with empirically-based evidence. Practical implications of earlier studies are also developed. 
650 0 |a Elections. 
650 0 |a Game theory. 
650 0 |a Welfare economics. 
650 1 4 |a Economics. 
650 2 4 |a Social Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice. 
650 2 4 |a Electoral Politics. 
650 2 4 |a Game Theory. 
650 2 4 |a Operations Research/Decision Theory. 
700 1 |a Lepelley, Dominique.  |e author. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319646589 
830 0 |a Studies in Choice and Welfare,  |x 1614-0311 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64659-6  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-ECF 
950 |a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)