De-Moralizing Gay Rights Some Queer Remarks on LGBT+ Rights Politics in the US /

This book critically interrogates three sets of distortions that emanate from the messianic core of 21st century public discourse on LGBT+ rights in the United States. The first relates to the critique of pinkwashing, often advanced by scholars who claim to be committed to an emancipatory politics....

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Ghosh, Cyril (Συγγραφέας, http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Palgrave Pivot, 2018.
Έκδοση:1st ed. 2018.
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 02786nam a2200457 4500
001 978-3-319-78840-1
003 DE-He213
005 20191025132142.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 180518s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783319788401  |9 978-3-319-78840-1 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-78840-1  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a JK1-9993 
072 7 |a JP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a POL040000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a JP  |x 1KBB  |2 thema 
082 0 4 |a 320.973  |2 23 
100 1 |a Ghosh, Cyril.  |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a De-Moralizing Gay Rights  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Some Queer Remarks on LGBT+ Rights Politics in the US /  |c by Cyril Ghosh. 
250 |a 1st ed. 2018. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing :  |b Imprint: Palgrave Pivot,  |c 2018. 
300 |a IX, 112 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 |a 1. De-Moralizing Gay Rights -- 2. Radical Theory Creep -- 3. Obergefell v. Hodges: Marriage Equality's Insistence on Family Values -- 4. Covering's Other Hidden Assault -- 5. Epilogue. 
520 |a This book critically interrogates three sets of distortions that emanate from the messianic core of 21st century public discourse on LGBT+ rights in the United States. The first relates to the critique of pinkwashing, often advanced by scholars who claim to be committed to an emancipatory politics. The second concerns a recent US Supreme Court decision, Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), a judgment that established marriage equality across the 50 states. The third distortion occurs in Kenji Yoshino's theorization of the concept of gay covering. Each distortion produces its own injunction to assimilate, sometimes into the dominant mainstream and, at other times, into the fold of what is axiomatically taken to be the category of the radical. Using a queer theoretic analysis, I argue for the dismantling of each of these three sets of assimilationist injunctions. 
650 0 |a United States-Politics and government. 
650 0 |a Public policy. 
650 1 4 |a US Politics.  |0 http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/911180 
650 2 4 |a Public Policy.  |0 http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/911060 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319788395 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319788418 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783030076597 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78840-1  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-POS 
950 |a Political Science and International Studies (Springer-41174)