|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03134nam a2200481 4500 |
| 001 |
978-3-319-90872-4 |
| 003 |
DE-He213 |
| 005 |
20191023111713.0 |
| 007 |
cr nn 008mamaa |
| 008 |
180625s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783319908724
|9 978-3-319-90872-4
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4
|2 doi
|
| 040 |
|
|
|d GrThAP
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a B67
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a PDA
|2 bicssc
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a SCI075000
|2 bisacsh
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a PDA
|2 thema
|
| 082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 501
|2 23
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Hvidtfeldt, Rolf.
|e author.
|4 aut
|4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Structure of Interdisciplinary Science
|h [electronic resource] /
|c by Rolf Hvidtfeldt.
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2018.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Cham :
|b Springer International Publishing :
|b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
|c 2018.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XVII, 295 p.
|b online resource.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 347 |
|
|
|a text file
|b PDF
|2 rda
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a New Directions in the Philosophy of Science
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1. Introduction -- 2. Disciplines and Approaches -- 3. Interdisciplinarity studies -- 4. The Relevance of Philosophy -- 5. Representation- 6. Pluralisms, Perspectives, and Potential Problems -- 7. Representational Crossbreeding -- 8. Phenomenology Imported With Ease -- 9. Conclusion -- Index.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This book presents a novel approach to the analysis of interdisciplinary science based on the contemporary philosophical literature on scientific representation. The basic motivation for developing this approach is that epistemic issues are insufficiently dealt with in the existing literature on interdisciplinarity. This means that when interdisciplinary science is praised (as it often is), it is far from clear to what extent this praise is merited - at least if one cares about various more or less standardised measures of scientific quality. To develop a more adequate way of capturing what is going on in interdisciplinary science, I draw inspiration from the rich philosophical literature on modelling, idealisation, perspectivism, and scientific pluralism. The discussion hereof reveals a number of critical pitfalls related to transferring mathematical and conceptual tools between scientific contexts, which should be relevant and interesting for anyone actively engaged in funding, evaluating, or carrying out interdisciplinary science.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Philosophy and science.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Epistemology.
|
| 650 |
1 |
4 |
|a Philosophy of Science.
|0 http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/E34000
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Epistemology.
|0 http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/E13000
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a SpringerLink (Online service)
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t Springer eBooks
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Printed edition:
|z 9783319908717
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Printed edition:
|z 9783319908731
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Printed edition:
|z 9783030081195
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a New Directions in the Philosophy of Science
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4
|z Full Text via HEAL-Link
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-2-REP
|
| 950 |
|
|
|a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)
|
