How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning

This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Bencze, Mátyás (Επιμελητής έκδοσης, http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt), Ng, Gar Yein (Επιμελητής έκδοσης, http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2018.
Έκδοση:1st ed. 2018.
Σειρά:Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 69
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
  • Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable?
  • Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life
  • Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality
  • Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics
  • Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies
  • Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities - Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning
  • Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales
  • Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy
  • Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France
  • Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary
  • Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic
  • Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary
  • Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals
  • Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union
  • Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.