|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02967nam a22004935i 4500 |
| 001 |
978-3-540-70527-7 |
| 003 |
DE-He213 |
| 005 |
20151204183319.0 |
| 007 |
cr nn 008mamaa |
| 008 |
100301s2009 gw | s |||| 0|eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783540705277
|9 978-3-540-70527-7
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1007/978-3-540-70527-7
|2 doi
|
| 040 |
|
|
|d GrThAP
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a K3236-3268.5
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a JPVH
|2 bicssc
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW051000
|2 bisacsh
|
| 082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 341.48
|2 23
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a International Human Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Individual Duties to Disobey Manifestly Illegal Orders
|h [electronic resource] /
|c edited by Hitomi Takemura.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Berlin, Heidelberg :
|b Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
|c 2009.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XII, 253 p.
|b online resource.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 347 |
|
|
|a text file
|b PDF
|2 rda
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Right to Conscientious Objection in the United Nations Human Rights Law -- Right to Conscientious Objection in European Human Rights Law -- Inter-American Human Rights Law -- International Refugee Law and Conscientious Objection -- Defence of Superior Orders: Duties of Individuals to Disobey Manifestly Illegal Orders under International Law -- Impacts of Jus Ad Bellum and Jus In Bello on Rights and Duties of Individuals to Disobey Manifestly Illegal Orders -- Conclusion.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a International human rights law grants individuals both rights and responsibilities. In this respect international criminal and international humanitarian law are no different. As members of the public international law family they are charged with the regulation, maintenance and protection of human dignity. The right and duty to disobey manifestly illegal orders traverses these three schools of public international law. This book is the first systematic study of the right to conscientious objection under international human rights law. Understanding that rights and duties are not mutually exclusive but complementary, this study analyses the right to conscientious objection and the duties of individuals under international law from various perspectives of public international law.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Law.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Political science.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Human rights.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a International humanitarian law.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a International criminal law.
|
| 650 |
1 |
4 |
|a Law.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Human Rights.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a International Humanitarian Law, Law of Armed Conflict.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a International Criminal Law.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Political Science.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Philosophy of Law.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Takemura, Hitomi.
|e editor.
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a SpringerLink (Online service)
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t Springer eBooks
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Printed edition:
|z 9783540705260
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70527-7
|z Full Text via HEAL-Link
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-2-SHU
|
| 950 |
|
|
|a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)
|
