On the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication Deconstructing Balancing and Judicial Activism /

Juliano Z. Benvindo investigates the current movement of constitutional courts towards political activism, especially by focusing on the increasing use of the balancing method as a “rational” justification for this process. From the critical perception of the serious risks of this movement to democr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benvindo, Juliano Zaiden (Author)
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer, 2010.
Subjects:
Online Access:Full Text via HEAL-Link
Table of Contents:
  • German and Brazilian Constitutional Cultures: Constitutional Adjudication and Activism
  • An Approach to Decision-Making
  • Balancing Within the Context of German Constitutionalism: The Bundesverfassungsgericht’s Shift to Activism
  • Balancing Within the Context of Brazilian Constitutionalism: The Supremo Tribunal Federal’s Shift to Activism
  • The Debate on the Rationality of Balancing
  • The Aim to Rationalize Balancing Within the Context of Constitutional Courts’ Activism
  • When Différance Comes to Light: Balancing Within the Context of Deconstruction
  • When Procedures Towards Mutual Understanding Come to Light: Balancing Within the Context of Proceduralism
  • The Concept of Limited Rationality
  • Between Différance and Intersubjectivity: The Concept of Limited Rationality in Constitutional Democracy
  • Between Différance and Intersubjectivity: The Concept of Limited Rationality in the Realm of Constitutional Adjudication.