On the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication Deconstructing Balancing and Judicial Activism /
Juliano Z. Benvindo investigates the current movement of constitutional courts towards political activism, especially by focusing on the increasing use of the balancing method as a “rational” justification for this process. From the critical perception of the serious risks of this movement to democr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Berlin, Heidelberg :
Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer,
2010.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Table of Contents:
- German and Brazilian Constitutional Cultures: Constitutional Adjudication and Activism
- An Approach to Decision-Making
- Balancing Within the Context of German Constitutionalism: The Bundesverfassungsgericht’s Shift to Activism
- Balancing Within the Context of Brazilian Constitutionalism: The Supremo Tribunal Federal’s Shift to Activism
- The Debate on the Rationality of Balancing
- The Aim to Rationalize Balancing Within the Context of Constitutional Courts’ Activism
- When Différance Comes to Light: Balancing Within the Context of Deconstruction
- When Procedures Towards Mutual Understanding Come to Light: Balancing Within the Context of Proceduralism
- The Concept of Limited Rationality
- Between Différance and Intersubjectivity: The Concept of Limited Rationality in Constitutional Democracy
- Between Différance and Intersubjectivity: The Concept of Limited Rationality in the Realm of Constitutional Adjudication.