Liability Rules in Patent Law A Legal and Economic Analysis /

The primary purpose of a patent law system should be to enhance economic efficiency, in particular by providing incentives for making inventions. The conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Krauspenhaar, Daniel (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer, 2015.
Σειρά:Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition, 1
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 02915nam a22004815i 4500
001 978-3-642-40900-4
003 DE-He213
005 20151031011107.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 141006s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783642409004  |9 978-3-642-40900-4 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-642-40900-4  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a K4240-4343 
050 4 |a K1401-1578.25 
072 7 |a LN  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW051000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 343.099  |2 23 
100 1 |a Krauspenhaar, Daniel.  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Liability Rules in Patent Law  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Legal and Economic Analysis /  |c by Daniel Krauspenhaar. 
264 1 |a Berlin, Heidelberg :  |b Springer Berlin Heidelberg :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2015. 
300 |a XIX, 233 p. 10 illus. in color.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition,  |x 2199-7462 ;  |v 1 
505 0 |a Introductory Remarks -- Overuse of Exclusivity in Patent Law -- Private Liability Rule Regimes -- Compulsory Liability Rule and Liability Rule by Default Regimes -- Overall View and Conclusion. 
520 |a The primary purpose of a patent law system should be to enhance economic efficiency, in particular by providing incentives for making inventions. The conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically interesting patent-law objectives, however, include the transfer and dissemination of knowledge. Mechanisms exist by which the patent owner decides if he or she would prefer exclusive or non-exclusive rights, for instance the  opportunity to declare the willingness to license and create patent pools. But it is questionable whether these mechanisms are sufficient and efficient enough in view of the existence of patent trolls and other problems. This work challenges the conventional wisdom to a certain extent and makes proposals for improvements. 
650 0 |a Law. 
650 0 |a International law. 
650 0 |a Intellectual property  |x Law and legislation. 
650 0 |a Law and economics. 
650 1 4 |a Law. 
650 2 4 |a International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law. 
650 2 4 |a Law and Economics. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783642408991 
830 0 |a Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition,  |x 2199-7462 ;  |v 1 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40900-4  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)