Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules /
In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from th...
| Main Authors: | Eemeren, Frans van (Author), Garssen, Bart (Author), Meuffels, Bert (Author) |
|---|---|
| Corporate Author: | SpringerLink (Online service) |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands,
2009.
|
| Series: | Argumentation Library,
16 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Similar Items
-
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse A Pragma-Dialectical Study /
Published: (2007) -
Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics /
by: van Eemeren, Frans H.
Published: (2015) -
Singular Reference: A Descriptivist Perspective
by: Orilia, Francesco
Published: (2010) -
Philosophy of Syntax Foundational Topics /
by: Talasiewicz, Mieszko
Published: (2010) -
Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory Twenty Exploratory Studies /
Published: (2012)