Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence A Formal Hybrid Theory /

In this book a theory of reasoning with evidence in the context of criminal cases is developed. The main subject of this study is not the law of evidence but rather the rational process of proof, which involves constructing, testing and justifying scenarios about what happened using evidence and com...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Bex, Floris J. (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2011.
Σειρά:Law and Philosophy Library, 92
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 03008nam a22004815i 4500
001 978-94-007-0140-3
003 DE-He213
005 20151120185157.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 110214s2011 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9789400701403  |9 978-94-007-0140-3 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-94-007-0140-3  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a K5000-5582 
072 7 |a LNF  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW026000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 345  |2 23 
100 1 |a Bex, Floris J.  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Formal Hybrid Theory /  |c by Floris J. Bex. 
264 1 |a Dordrecht :  |b Springer Netherlands,  |c 2011. 
300 |a X, 292 p. 109 illus.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Law and Philosophy Library,  |x 1572-4395 ;  |v 92 
505 0 |a Preface -- Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Reasoning with criminal evidence -- Chapter 3. Two approaches to reasoning with evidence: arguments and stories -- Chapter 4. A hybrid theory of stories and arguments -- Chapter 5. A formal logical hybrid theory of argumentation and explanation -- Chapter 6. Case study: Murder in Anjum -- Chapter 7. Related research on reasoning with criminal evidence -- Chapter 8. Conclusions. – References -- Index. 
520 |a In this book a theory of reasoning with evidence in the context of criminal cases is developed. The main subject of this study is not the law of evidence but rather the rational process of proof, which involves constructing, testing and justifying scenarios about what happened using evidence and commonsense knowledge. A central theme in the book is the analysis of ones reasoning, so that complex patterns are made more explicit and clear. This analysis uses stories about what happened and arguments to anchor these stories in evidence. Thus the argumentative and the narrative approaches from the research in legal philosophy and legal psychology are combined. Because the book describes its subjects in both an informal and a formal style, it is relevant for scholars in legal philosophy, AI, logic and argumentation theory. The book can also appeal to practitioners in the investigative and legal professions, who are interested in the ways in which they can and should reason with evidence. 
650 0 |a Law. 
650 0 |a Political science. 
650 0 |a Criminal law. 
650 0 |a Psychology. 
650 1 4 |a Law. 
650 2 4 |a Criminal Law. 
650 2 4 |a Law and Psychology. 
650 2 4 |a Philosophy of Law. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9789400701397 
830 0 |a Law and Philosophy Library,  |x 1572-4395 ;  |v 92 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0140-3  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)