|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03391nam a22005175i 4500 |
| 001 |
978-94-007-1497-7 |
| 003 |
DE-He213 |
| 005 |
20151204151819.0 |
| 007 |
cr nn 008mamaa |
| 008 |
110803s2011 ne | s |||| 0|eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789400714977
|9 978-94-007-1497-7
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1007/978-94-007-1497-7
|2 doi
|
| 040 |
|
|
|d GrThAP
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a K201-487
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a B65
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a K140-165
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a LAB
|2 bicssc
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW079000
|2 bisacsh
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a PHI021000
|2 bisacsh
|
| 082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 340.1
|2 23
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Casellas, Núria.
|e author.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Legal Ontology Engineering
|h [electronic resource] :
|b Methodologies, Modelling Trends, and the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge /
|c by Núria Casellas.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Dordrecht :
|b Springer Netherlands,
|c 2011.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XXII, 298 p.
|b online resource.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 347 |
|
|
|a text file
|b PDF
|2 rda
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a Law, Governance and Technology Series ;
|v 3
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1 Introduction -- 2 On Ontologies -- 3 Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Ontology Design -- 4 Legal Ontologies -- 5 Modelling Judicial Professional Knowledge: A Case Study -- 6 Some Final Remarks and Issues for Discussion -- References -- Index.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Enabling information interoperability, fostering legal knowledge usability and reuse, enhancing legal information search, in short, formalizing the complexity of legal knowledge to enhance legal knowledge management are challenging tasks, for which different solutions and lines of research have been proposed. During the last decade, research and applications based on the use of legal ontologies as a technique to represent legal knowledge has raised a very interesting debate about their capacity and limitations to represent conceptual structures in the legal domain. Making conceptual legal knowledge explicit would support the development of a web of legal knowledge, improve communication, create trust and enable and support open data, e-government and e-democracy activities. Moreover, this explicit knowledge is also relevant to the formalization of software agents and the shaping of virtual institutions and multi-agent systems or environments. This book explores the use of ontologism in legal knowledge representation for semantically-enhanced legal knowledge systems or web-based applications. In it, current methodologies, tools and languages used for ontology development are revised, and the book includes an exhaustive revision of existing ontologies in the legal domain. The development of the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge (OPJK) is presented as a case study.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Law.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Political science.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Computers.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Law
|x Philosophy.
|
| 650 |
1 |
4 |
|a Law.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Information Systems and Communication Service.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Philosophy of Law.
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a SpringerLink (Online service)
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t Springer eBooks
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Printed edition:
|z 9789400714960
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a Law, Governance and Technology Series ;
|v 3
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1497-7
|z Full Text via HEAL-Link
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-2-SHU
|
| 950 |
|
|
|a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)
|
