Weed Science - A Plea for Thought - Revisited

Weed scientists are confident of increasing production through agricultural technology, including herbicides, but do not must ask if the moral obligation to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that lea...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Zimdahl, Robert L. (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2012.
Σειρά:SpringerBriefs in Agriculture,
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 02040nam a22004215i 4500
001 978-94-007-2088-6
003 DE-He213
005 20140325031021.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 110924s2012 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9789400720886  |9 978-94-007-2088-6 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-94-007-2088-6  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a S1-S972 
072 7 |a TVB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a TEC003000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 630  |2 23 
100 1 |a Zimdahl, Robert L.  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Weed Science - A Plea for Thought - Revisited  |h [electronic resource] /  |c by Robert L. Zimdahl. 
264 1 |a Dordrecht :  |b Springer Netherlands :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2012. 
300 |a XII, 73 p. 1 illus.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a SpringerBriefs in Agriculture,  |x 2211-808X 
520 |a Weed scientists are confident of increasing production through agricultural technology, including herbicides, but do not must ask if the moral obligation to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that leads to appropriate change is advocated. Weed scientists have a research consensus - a paradigm - Weeds must be controlled. Herbicides are the best control technology. Agriculture's practitoners should discuss the necessity and risks of their technology. Discussion must include scientific evidence and value-laden arguments. 
650 0 |a Life sciences. 
650 0 |a Agriculture. 
650 1 4 |a Life Sciences. 
650 2 4 |a Agriculture. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9789400720879 
830 0 |a SpringerBriefs in Agriculture,  |x 2211-808X 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2088-6  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SBL 
950 |a Biomedical and Life Sciences (Springer-11642)