|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02774nam a22004335i 4500 |
| 001 |
978-94-007-4408-0 |
| 003 |
DE-He213 |
| 005 |
20151120192538.0 |
| 007 |
cr nn 008mamaa |
| 008 |
120703s2012 ne | s |||| 0|eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789400744080
|9 978-94-007-4408-0
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1007/978-94-007-4408-0
|2 doi
|
| 040 |
|
|
|d GrThAP
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a B67
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a PDA
|2 bicssc
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a SCI075000
|2 bisacsh
|
| 082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 501
|2 23
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Bunge, Mario.
|e author.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluating Philosophies
|h [electronic resource] /
|c by Mario Bunge.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Dordrecht :
|b Springer Netherlands :
|b Imprint: Springer,
|c 2012.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XIV, 202 p.
|b online resource.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 347 |
|
|
|a text file
|b PDF
|2 rda
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,
|x 0068-0346 ;
|v 295
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Preface -- Introduction.- A. How to Nuture of Hinder Research -- 1 Philosophies and phobosophies -- 2 The philosophical matrix of scientific progress -- 3 Systemics and materalism -- B. Philosophy in Action -- 4 Technoscience? -- 5 Climate and logic -- 6 Information Science: one or many? -- 7 Wealth and wellbeing -- 8 Can standard economic theory explain crises? -- 9 Marxism: Promise and reality -- 10 Rules of law: Just and unjust -- C Philosophical Gaps.- 11 Are subjective probabilities admissible? -- 12 Can induction deliver high-level hypotheses? .- 13 Bridging theory to data -- 14 Energy: physics or metaphysics? -- 15 Does quantum physics refute realism? -- 16 Parallel universes? ¿Digital physics? -- 17 Can functionalist psychology explain? -- 18 Knowledge pyramids and rosettes -- 19 Existence: one or two? -- 20 Conclusion: Evaluation Criterion -- 21 Glossary. .
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Philosophies, whether genuine or spurious, are not usually adopted because of their conceptual, empirical, or moral merits, but because of tradition, political interests, or even temperament–none of which is a good reason. The present book argues for a precise criterion: A philosophy is worth what it helps learn, act, conserve our common heritage, and get along with fellow humans.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Philosophy.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Philosophy and science.
|
| 650 |
1 |
4 |
|a Philosophy.
|
| 650 |
2 |
4 |
|a Philosophy of Science.
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a SpringerLink (Online service)
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t Springer eBooks
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Printed edition:
|z 9789400744073
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,
|x 0068-0346 ;
|v 295
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4408-0
|z Full Text via HEAL-Link
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-2-SHU
|
| 950 |
|
|
|a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)
|
