Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs
Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth- and consensu...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2013.
|
Σειρά: | Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ;
357 |
Θέματα: | |
Διαθέσιμο Online: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- 1. General Introduction
- 2. Theory of Dialectical Structures
- Part I: Why Do We Agree? On the Consensus-conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation
- 3. Introduction to Part I.- 4. Random Debates
- 5. Background Knowledge
- 6. Four Argumentation Strategies
- 7. Argumentation Strategies in Many-proponent Debates
- 8. Core Updating
- 9. Core Argumentation
- Part II: How Do We Know? On the Truth-conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation
- 10. Introduction to Part II
- 11. Random Debates
- 12. Background Knowledge
- 13. Four Argumentation Strategies
- 14. Argumentation Strategies in Many-proponent Debates
- 15. Core Updating
- 16. Core Argumentation
- Symbols
- References
- Index.