Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs

Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth- and consensu...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Betz, Gregor (Συγγραφέας)
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
Σειρά:Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ; 357
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
  • 1. General Introduction
  • 2. Theory of Dialectical Structures
  • Part I: Why Do We Agree? On the Consensus-conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation
  • 3. Introduction to Part I.- 4. Random Debates
  • 5. Background Knowledge
  • 6. Four Argumentation Strategies
  • 7. Argumentation Strategies in Many-proponent Debates
  • 8. Core Updating
  • 9. Core Argumentation
  • Part II: How Do We Know? On the Truth-conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation
  • 10. Introduction to Part II
  • 11. Random Debates
  • 12. Background Knowledge
  • 13. Four Argumentation Strategies
  • 14. Argumentation Strategies in Many-proponent Debates
  • 15. Core Updating
  • 16. Core Argumentation
  • Symbols
  • References
  • Index.