Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic

This compelling reevaluation of the relationship between logic and knowledge affirms the key role that the notion of judgement must play in such a review. The commentary repatriates the concept of judgement in the discussion, banished in recent times by the logical positivism of Wittgenstein, Hilber...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: van der Schaar, Maria (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
Σειρά:Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ; 31
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
  • Preface
  • Part 1. Constructivism, Judgement, and Reason
  • Chapter 1. Verificationism then and now: Per Martin-Löf
  • Chapter 2. Demonstrations versus Proofs, being an afterword to 'Constructions, Proofs and the meaning of Logical Constants': Göran Sundholm
  • Chapter 3. Containment and Variation: Two Strands in the Development of Analyticity from Aristotle to Martin-Löf: Göran Sundholm
  • Part 2. Judgement and Reason in the Seventeenth Century
  • Chapter 4. Decartes' Theory of Judgement: Warranted Assertions, the Key to Science: Elodie Cassan
  • Chapter 5. Striving, Oomph, and Intelligibility in Spinoza: Michael Della Rocca
  • Part 3. Kant, Neo-Kantianism, and Bolzano
  • Chapter 6. The Role of Wolff's Analysis of Judgments in Kant's Inaugural Dissertation: Johan Blok
  • Chapter 7. Windelband on 'Beurteilung’: Arnaud Dewalque
  • Chapter 8. A Priori Knowledge in Bolzano; Conceptual Truths and Judgements: Stefan Roski
  • Part 4. Husserl, Frege and Russell
  • Chapter 9. Immanent and Real States of Affairs in Husserl's Early Theory of Judgement: Robin Rollinger
  • Chapter 10. Frege and Russell on Assertion: Jeremy Kelly.