Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law

• Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
• Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Thaman, Stephen C. (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
• Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
• Γλώσσα: English
• Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
• Σειρά: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ; 20
• Θέματα: Law.; Criminal law.; Private international law.; Conflict of laws.; International law.; Comparative law.; Public international law.; Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.; Criminal Law.; Public International Law.

This book is a comparative study of the exclusion of illegally gathered evidence in the criminal trial , which includes 15 country studies, a chapter on the European Court of Human Rights, and a comparative synthetic conclusion.  No other book has undertaken such a broad comparative study of exclusi...

Πίνακας περιεχομένων:

• Introduction; Stephen C. Thaman
• Part One: The Vicissitudes of Court-Made Exclusionary Tests: Section One: Common Law Jurisdictions
• Chapter 1: The United States: The Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Exclusionary Rule; Mark E. Cammack
• Chapter 2:  Ireland: A Move to Categorical Exclusion?; Arnaud Cras and Yvonne Daly
• Chapter  3: Scotland: A Plea for Consistency; Fiona Leverick and Findlay Stark
• Chapter 4:  Israel: The Supreme Court’s New, Cautious Exclusionary Rule; Yuval Merin and Rinat Kitai-Sangero
• Part One: The Vicissitudes of Court-Made Exclusionary Tests:Section Two: Civil Law Balancing
• Chapter 5:  Germany: Balancing Truth against Protected Constitutional Interests; Sabine Gless
• Part Two: From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules in Continental Europe:  Section One: The Traditional Approach Based on Statutory Nullities
• Chapter 6:  France: Procedural Nullities and Exclusion; Jean Pradel
• Part Two: From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules in Continental Europe: Section Two: From Nullities to Balancing
• Chapter 7: Belgium: From Categorical Nullities to a Judicially Created Balancing Test; Marie-Aude Beernaert and Philip Traest
• Chapter 8:  The Netherlands: Statutory Balancing and a Choice of Remedies: Matthias Borgers and Lonneke Stevens
• Part Two: From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules in Continental Europe: Section Three:  From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules
• Chapter 9:  Spain: The Constitutional Court’s Move From Categorical Exclusion to Limited Balancing; Lorena Bachmaier Winter
• Chapter 10:  Italy: Statutory Nullities and Non-Usability; Giulio Illuminati.-  Chapter 11:  Greece: From Nullities to Categorical Statutory and Constitutional Exclusionary Rules; George Triantafyllou
• Chapter 12: Turkey: The Move to Categorical Exclusion of Illegally Gathered Evidence; Adem Sözüer
• Chapter 13:  Serbia: Courts Struggle With a New Categorical Statutory  Exclusionary Rule; Snežana Brkić
• Part Three:  The Fair Trial Test for Exclusion
• Chapter 14: England and Wales: Fair Trial Analysis and the Presumed Admissibility of Physical Evidence; Andrew L-T Choo
• Chapter  15:  Taiwan: The Codification of a Judicially-Made Discretionary Exclusionary Rule; Jaw-perng Wang
• Chapter 16: The European Court of Human Rights: The Fair Trial Analysis under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights; Pinar Ölcer
• Part Four: A Comparison of Exclusionary Jurisprudence
• Chapter 17: Balancing Truth Against Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis of the Use of Illegally Gathered Evidence in the Criminal Trial; Stephen C. Thaman.-About the contributors
• index.