Bayesian Argumentation The practical side of probability /
Relevant to, and drawing from, a range of disciplines, the chapters in this collection show the diversity, and applicability, of research in Bayesian argumentation. Together, they form a challenge to philosophers versed in both the use and criticism of Bayesian models who have largely overlooked the...
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
---|---|
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2013.
|
Σειρά: | Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ;
362 |
Θέματα: | |
Διαθέσιμο Online: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- Introduction: Frank Zenker. - Part 1
- The Bayesian Approach to Argumentation
- Chapter 1. Testimony and Argument: A Bayesian Perspective: Ulrike Hahn, Mike Oaksford and Adam J.L. Harris
- Chapter 2. Why are we convinced by the Ad Hominem Argument?: Source Reliability or Pragma-Dialectics: Mike Oaksford and Ulrike Hahn.- Part 2. The Legal Domain.-Chapter 3. A survey of uncertainties and their consequences in Probabilistic Legal Argumentation: Matthias Grabmair and Kevin D. Ashley
- Chapter 4. What went wrong in the case of Sally Clark? A case-study of the use of Statistical Evidence in Court: Amid Pundik
- Part 3. Modeling Rational Agents
- Chapter 5. A Bayesian Simulation Model of Group Deliberation: Erik J. Olsson
- Chapter 6. Degrees of Justification, Bayes' Rule, and Rationality: Gregor Betz
- Chapter 7. Argumentation with (Bounded) Rational Agents: Robert van Rooij and Kris de Jaeghery
- Part 4. Theoretical Issues
- Chapter 8. Reductio, Coherence, and the Myth of Epistemic Circularity: Tomoji Shogenji
- Chapter 9. On Argument Strength: Niki Pfeifer
- Chapter 10
- Upping the Stakes and the Preface Paradox: Jonny Blamey
- References.