Bayesian Argumentation The practical side of probability /

Relevant to, and drawing from, a range of disciplines, the chapters in this collection show the diversity, and applicability, of research in Bayesian argumentation. Together, they form a challenge to philosophers versed in both the use and criticism of Bayesian models who have largely overlooked the...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Zenker, Frank (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
Σειρά:Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ; 362
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
  • Introduction: Frank Zenker. - Part 1
  • The Bayesian Approach to Argumentation
  • Chapter 1. Testimony and Argument: A Bayesian Perspective: Ulrike Hahn, Mike Oaksford and Adam J.L. Harris
  • Chapter 2. Why are we convinced by the Ad Hominem Argument?: Source Reliability or Pragma-Dialectics: Mike Oaksford and Ulrike Hahn.- Part 2. The Legal Domain.-Chapter 3. A survey of uncertainties and their consequences in Probabilistic Legal Argumentation: Matthias Grabmair and Kevin D. Ashley
  • Chapter 4. What went wrong in the case of Sally Clark? A case-study of the use of Statistical Evidence in Court: Amid Pundik
  • Part 3. Modeling Rational Agents
  • Chapter 5. A Bayesian Simulation Model of Group Deliberation: Erik J. Olsson
  • Chapter 6. Degrees of Justification, Bayes' Rule, and Rationality: Gregor Betz
  • Chapter 7. Argumentation with (Bounded) Rational Agents: Robert van Rooij and Kris de Jaeghery
  • Part 4. Theoretical Issues
  • Chapter 8. Reductio, Coherence, and the Myth of Epistemic Circularity: Tomoji Shogenji
  • Chapter 9. On Argument Strength: Niki Pfeifer
  • Chapter 10
  • Upping the Stakes and the Preface Paradox: Jonny Blamey
  • References.