Precedent in the United States Supreme Court
This volume presents a variety of both normative and descriptive perspectives on the use of precedent by the United States Supreme Court. It brings together a diverse group of American legal scholars, some of whom have been influenced by the Segal/Spaeth "attitudinal" model and some of wh...
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
---|---|
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2013.
|
Σειρά: | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,
33 |
Θέματα: | |
Διαθέσιμο Online: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- Contributors
- Introduction; Christopher J. Peters
- 1 The Dialectic of Stare Decisis Doctrine; Colin Starger
- 2 Did Casey Strike Out? Following and Overruling Constitutional Precedents in the Supreme Court; Larry Alexander
- 3 An Epistemic Defense of Precedent; Deborah Hellman
- 4 Private-Rights Litigation and the Normative Foundations of Durable Constitutional Precedent ; Maxwell L. Stearns
- 5 Group Formation and Precedent; Neal Devins
- 6 Stare Decisis and the Selection Effect; Frederick Schauer
- 7 Methodological Stare Decisis and Constitutional Interpretation; Chad M. Oldfather
- 8 Constitutional Method and the Path of Precedent; Randy J. Kozel
- 9 Originalism, Stare Decisis, and Constitutional Authority; Christopher J. Peters
- Index.