Reflections on Naturalism

To naturalists, there is no such thing as complete justification for any claim, and so requiring complete warrant for naturalist proposals is an unreasonable request. The proper guideline for naturalist proposals seems thus clear: develop it using the methods of science; if this leads to a fruitful...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: SpringerLink (Online service)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Galparsoro, José Ignacio (Επιμελητής έκδοσης), Cordero, Alberto (Επιμελητής έκδοσης)
Μορφή: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Ηλ. βιβλίο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Rotterdam : SensePublishers : Imprint: SensePublishers, 2013.
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Full Text via HEAL-Link
LEADER 02734nam a22003855i 4500
001 978-94-6209-296-9
003 DE-He213
005 20151204174559.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130904s2013 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9789462092969  |9 978-94-6209-296-9 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-94-6209-296-9  |2 doi 
040 |d GrThAP 
050 4 |a L1-991 
072 7 |a JN  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a EDU000000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 370  |2 23 
245 1 0 |a Reflections on Naturalism  |h [electronic resource] /  |c edited by José Ignacio Galparsoro, Alberto Cordero. 
264 1 |a Rotterdam :  |b SensePublishers :  |b Imprint: SensePublishers,  |c 2013. 
300 |a X, 168 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
520 |a To naturalists, there is no such thing as complete justification for any claim, and so requiring complete warrant for naturalist proposals is an unreasonable request. The proper guideline for naturalist proposals seems thus clear: develop it using the methods of science; if this leads to a fruitful stance, then explicate and reassess. The resulting offer will exhibit virtuous circularity if its explanatory feedback loop involves critical reassessment as the explanations it encompasses play out. So viewed, naturalism is a philosophical perspective that seeks to unite in a virtuous circle the natural sciences and non-foundationalist, broadly-based empiricism. Other common lines of antinaturalist complaint are that naturalization efforts seem fruitful only in some areas, also that several endeavors outside the sciences serve as sources of knowledge into human life and the human condition, especially in areas where science does not reach terribly far as yet. It seems hard not to grant some truth to many allegories from literature, art and some religions. Naturalism has room for knowledge gathered outside science, provided the imported claims satisfy also by naturalistic methods. Naturalism and the debate about its scope and limits thrive on discrepancy. We hope that, collectively, the selected essays that follow will give a fair view of the vitality and tribulations of naturalism as a variegated contemporary philosophical perspective. 
650 0 |a Education. 
650 1 4 |a Education. 
650 2 4 |a Education, general. 
700 1 |a Galparsoro, José Ignacio.  |e editor. 
700 1 |a Cordero, Alberto.  |e editor. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-296-9  |z Full Text via HEAL-Link 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)