The European Public Prosecutor’s Office An extended arm or a Two-Headed dragon? /
In July 2013 the European Commission launched its legislative proposal to create a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). The proposal provoked fierce debates, politically as well as on the academic level. Many national parliaments opposed and submitted formally their grievances to the Commiss...
| Corporate Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Hague :
T.M.C. Asser Press : Imprint: T.M.C. Asser Press,
2015.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Full Text via HEAL-Link |
Table of Contents:
- Introduction
- Presentation of the Commission’s proposal on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office
- The Commission’s legislative proposal: an overview of its main characteristics
- Is the Commission proposal for a European Public Prosecutor's Office based on a harmonious interpretation of Articles 85 and 86 TFEU?
- Constitutional issues of multilevel prosecution by the European Public Prosecutor's Office from a Union perspective
- The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and Eurojust: ‘Love match or arranged marriage’?
- Some explorations into the EPPO’s administrative structure and judicial review
- Search and seizure measures and their review
- The choice of forum by the European Public Prosecutor
- Issues of conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality
- European Public Prosecution’s Office: A far from perfect proposal
- Establishing enhanced cooperation under Article 86 TFEU
- Implications of enhanced cooperation for the EPPO model and its functioning.