An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9

Background: Tissue coverage and strut apposition of drug eluting stents (DES), which can be assessed with 21 optical coherence tomography (OCT), may be associated with late stent thrombosis (LST). 22 Methods: Prospective observational angiographic and OCT follow-up at 6 months post-implantation of...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Davlouros, Periklis, Mavronasiou, Eleni, Xanthopoulou, Ioanna, Karantalis, Vasileios, Tsigkas, Grigorios, Hahalis, George, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Δαβλούρος, Περικλής
Μορφή: Journal (paper)
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: 2019
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.072
http://hdl.handle.net/10889/11912
id nemertes-10889-11912
record_format dspace
spelling nemertes-10889-119122022-09-05T09:41:35Z An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9 Davlouros, Periklis Mavronasiou, Eleni Xanthopoulou, Ioanna Karantalis, Vasileios Tsigkas, Grigorios Hahalis, George Alexopoulos, Dimitrios Δαβλούρος, Περικλής Μαυρονάσιου, Ελένη Καρανταλής, Βασίλειος Τσίγκας, Γρηγόριος Χαλάλης, Γεώργιος Ξανθοπούλου, Ιωάννα Αλεξόπουλος, Δημήτριος Optical coherence tomography (OCT) Paclitaxel Biolimus-A9 Neointimal coverage Malapposition Οπτική τομογραφία συνοχής Πακλιταξέλη Background: Tissue coverage and strut apposition of drug eluting stents (DES), which can be assessed with 21 optical coherence tomography (OCT), may be associated with late stent thrombosis (LST). 22 Methods: Prospective observational angiographic and OCT follow-up at 6 months post-implantation of a 23 biolimus-A9 eluting stent (BES) vs. a paclitaxel eluting stent (PES), with biodegradable polymer carriers. The 24 primary outcome was the percent difference of uncovered struts between BESs and PESs. 25 Results: A maximum likelihood model was used for analysis, to account for data clustering. Sixteen patients 26 were treated with BES (28 lesions/4530 struts) and 16 with PES (23 lesions/4450 struts). Overall, BESs 27 compared to PESs had more uncovered [0.41% vs. 0.21%, difference estimate (DE) 0.2 (95% CI, 0.06–0.34), 28 p=0.006], malapposed [0.18% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.14 (95% CI 0.05–0.23), p=0.003], uncovered and malapposed 29 [0.08% vs. 0.026%, DE 0.057 (95% CI 0.015–0.1), p=0.01] and protruding struts [0.23% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.185 (95% 30 CI 0.1–0.27), pb0.001], and significantly lower neointimal thickness (59.3± 28.2 μm vs. 201.7± 97.5, 31 pb0.001). None of the BESs was totally covered with neointima, in contrast to 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.01). 32 Thrombus was detected in 1 (3.6%) BES and 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.05); however, no patient experienced 33 clinical stent thrombosis. 34 Conclusion: Between two stents with biodegradable polymer, OCT demonstrated that BESs had more 35 uncovered and malapposed struts compared to PESs at 6 months. This difference might be partly attributed to 36 the more potent antiproliferative properties of biolimus-A9; however, its impact on clinical outcome and on 37 the risk of LST is yet to be determined. -- 2019-02-01T19:09:48Z 2019-02-01T19:09:48Z 2011-11 Journal (paper) Davlouros P.A., Mavronasiou E., Xanthopoulou I., Karantalis V., Tsigkas G., Hahalis G., Alexopoulos D. (2012), 'An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9', International Journal of Cardiology, 157:3, pp. 341-346. Preprint https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.072 http://hdl.handle.net/10889/11912 en application/pdf International Journal of Cardiology
institution UPatras
collection Nemertes
language English
topic Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Paclitaxel
Biolimus-A9
Neointimal coverage
Malapposition
Οπτική τομογραφία συνοχής
Πακλιταξέλη
spellingShingle Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Paclitaxel
Biolimus-A9
Neointimal coverage
Malapposition
Οπτική τομογραφία συνοχής
Πακλιταξέλη
Davlouros, Periklis
Mavronasiou, Eleni
Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
Karantalis, Vasileios
Tsigkas, Grigorios
Hahalis, George
Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9
description Background: Tissue coverage and strut apposition of drug eluting stents (DES), which can be assessed with 21 optical coherence tomography (OCT), may be associated with late stent thrombosis (LST). 22 Methods: Prospective observational angiographic and OCT follow-up at 6 months post-implantation of a 23 biolimus-A9 eluting stent (BES) vs. a paclitaxel eluting stent (PES), with biodegradable polymer carriers. The 24 primary outcome was the percent difference of uncovered struts between BESs and PESs. 25 Results: A maximum likelihood model was used for analysis, to account for data clustering. Sixteen patients 26 were treated with BES (28 lesions/4530 struts) and 16 with PES (23 lesions/4450 struts). Overall, BESs 27 compared to PESs had more uncovered [0.41% vs. 0.21%, difference estimate (DE) 0.2 (95% CI, 0.06–0.34), 28 p=0.006], malapposed [0.18% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.14 (95% CI 0.05–0.23), p=0.003], uncovered and malapposed 29 [0.08% vs. 0.026%, DE 0.057 (95% CI 0.015–0.1), p=0.01] and protruding struts [0.23% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.185 (95% 30 CI 0.1–0.27), pb0.001], and significantly lower neointimal thickness (59.3± 28.2 μm vs. 201.7± 97.5, 31 pb0.001). None of the BESs was totally covered with neointima, in contrast to 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.01). 32 Thrombus was detected in 1 (3.6%) BES and 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.05); however, no patient experienced 33 clinical stent thrombosis. 34 Conclusion: Between two stents with biodegradable polymer, OCT demonstrated that BESs had more 35 uncovered and malapposed struts compared to PESs at 6 months. This difference might be partly attributed to 36 the more potent antiproliferative properties of biolimus-A9; however, its impact on clinical outcome and on 37 the risk of LST is yet to be determined.
author2 Δαβλούρος, Περικλής
author_facet Δαβλούρος, Περικλής
Davlouros, Periklis
Mavronasiou, Eleni
Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
Karantalis, Vasileios
Tsigkas, Grigorios
Hahalis, George
Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
format Journal (paper)
author Davlouros, Periklis
Mavronasiou, Eleni
Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
Karantalis, Vasileios
Tsigkas, Grigorios
Hahalis, George
Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
author_sort Davlouros, Periklis
title An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9
title_short An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9
title_full An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9
title_fullStr An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9
title_full_unstemmed An optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-A9
title_sort optical coherence tomography study of two new generation stents with 2 biodegradable polymer carrier, eluting paclitaxel vs. biolimus-a9
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.072
http://hdl.handle.net/10889/11912
work_keys_str_mv AT davlourosperiklis anopticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT mavronasioueleni anopticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT xanthopoulouioanna anopticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT karantalisvasileios anopticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT tsigkasgrigorios anopticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT hahalisgeorge anopticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT alexopoulosdimitrios anopticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT davlourosperiklis opticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT mavronasioueleni opticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT xanthopoulouioanna opticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT karantalisvasileios opticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT tsigkasgrigorios opticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT hahalisgeorge opticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
AT alexopoulosdimitrios opticalcoherencetomographystudyoftwonewgenerationstentswith2biodegradablepolymercarrierelutingpaclitaxelvsbiolimusa9
_version_ 1771297183253921792