Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a novel technique in radiotherapy, based on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), that enables simultaneous variation of gantry speed, collimator angle and dose rate, in order to change the field shape. This study aims to evaluate and compare two d...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Καραμάρκου, Ευθαλία
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Karamarkou, Efthalia
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: 2021
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:http://hdl.handle.net/10889/14748
id nemertes-10889-14748
record_format dspace
spelling nemertes-10889-147482022-09-05T09:41:53Z Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy Βελτιστοποίηση και ανθεκτικότητα διαφορετικών τεχνικών ογκομετρικά διαμορφούμενης τοξοειδούς ακτινοθεραπείας (VMAT) στην ακτινοθεραπεία χαμηλού ρίσκου καρκίνου του προστάτη Καραμάρκου, Ευθαλία Karamarkou, Efthalia Radiation therapy Volumetric modulated arc therapy Prostate cancer Biological optimization Physical optimization Ραδιοθεραπεία Καρκίνος προστάτη Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a novel technique in radiotherapy, based on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), that enables simultaneous variation of gantry speed, collimator angle and dose rate, in order to change the field shape. This study aims to evaluate and compare two different optimization methods used for VMAT plans in prostate cancer. Nineteen prostate cancer cases were examined. Two different plans were created for each patient, using either biological or physical cost functions, provided by Monaco Treatment Planning System (TPS) (Elekta, Crawley, UK). Plan comparison was based on target coverage and surrounding healthy tissue protection, by utilizing dose-volume-histogram (DVH) outcomes, conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). Finally, patient specific quality assurance (psQA) took place to observe the deliverability and robustness of the two plans, in terms of three acceptance criteria (3%/2 mm, 2%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm). Outcomes of the two different plans were studied using the paired samples t-test with a threshold of p<0.05 for statistical significance. In general, both of the plans were clinically acceptable. In both plans target dose coverage and homogeneity and conformity index, were comparable. Even though, the monitor units were more in the biological-based plan, this amount was not considerably high. On the other hand, in terms of OARs, in any structure and any dose level, the biologically optimized VMAT plan was significantly better (p<0.05). Finally, both of the plans passed with at least 98% the 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm acceptance criteria of gamma-analysis in psQA. In conclusion, both of the plans create good target-coverage and they can be efficiently delivered. However, a superiority of the biological-based VMAT plan was observed in terms of OARs sparing. 2021-04-08T05:19:09Z 2021-04-08T05:19:09Z 2021-03 http://hdl.handle.net/10889/14748 en application/pdf
institution UPatras
collection Nemertes
language English
topic Radiation therapy
Volumetric modulated arc therapy
Prostate cancer
Biological optimization
Physical optimization
Ραδιοθεραπεία
Καρκίνος προστάτη
spellingShingle Radiation therapy
Volumetric modulated arc therapy
Prostate cancer
Biological optimization
Physical optimization
Ραδιοθεραπεία
Καρκίνος προστάτη
Καραμάρκου, Ευθαλία
Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy
description Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a novel technique in radiotherapy, based on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), that enables simultaneous variation of gantry speed, collimator angle and dose rate, in order to change the field shape. This study aims to evaluate and compare two different optimization methods used for VMAT plans in prostate cancer. Nineteen prostate cancer cases were examined. Two different plans were created for each patient, using either biological or physical cost functions, provided by Monaco Treatment Planning System (TPS) (Elekta, Crawley, UK). Plan comparison was based on target coverage and surrounding healthy tissue protection, by utilizing dose-volume-histogram (DVH) outcomes, conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). Finally, patient specific quality assurance (psQA) took place to observe the deliverability and robustness of the two plans, in terms of three acceptance criteria (3%/2 mm, 2%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm). Outcomes of the two different plans were studied using the paired samples t-test with a threshold of p<0.05 for statistical significance. In general, both of the plans were clinically acceptable. In both plans target dose coverage and homogeneity and conformity index, were comparable. Even though, the monitor units were more in the biological-based plan, this amount was not considerably high. On the other hand, in terms of OARs, in any structure and any dose level, the biologically optimized VMAT plan was significantly better (p<0.05). Finally, both of the plans passed with at least 98% the 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm acceptance criteria of gamma-analysis in psQA. In conclusion, both of the plans create good target-coverage and they can be efficiently delivered. However, a superiority of the biological-based VMAT plan was observed in terms of OARs sparing.
author2 Karamarkou, Efthalia
author_facet Karamarkou, Efthalia
Καραμάρκου, Ευθαλία
author Καραμάρκου, Ευθαλία
author_sort Καραμάρκου, Ευθαλία
title Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_short Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_full Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_fullStr Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Optimization and robustness of different VMAT techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_sort optimization and robustness of different vmat techniques in low-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/10889/14748
work_keys_str_mv AT karamarkoueuthalia optimizationandrobustnessofdifferentvmattechniquesinlowriskprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT karamarkoueuthalia beltistopoiēsēkaianthektikotētadiaphoretikōntechnikōnonkometrikadiamorphoumenēstoxoeidousaktinotherapeiasvmatstēnaktinotherapeiachamēlouriskoukarkinoutouprostatē
_version_ 1771297183250776064