| Περίληψη: | The purpose of this work is to investigate the influence of possible patient movement and anatomy alteration on the quality of delivered prostate US based HDR-brachytherapy. The effect of patient movement and anatomy change (after the needle implantation and 3D image set acquisition) on catheter and organ dislocation and the consequences that this generated on the DVHs, conformity index and on radiobiological parameters.
Materials and methods: This work is based on 3D image sets and treatment plans of 48 patients obtained right after the needle implantation (clinical plan is based on this 3D image set) and before and after the irradiation. In our institution the 3D-US based pre-planning, the transperineal implantation of needles using template and the intraoperative planning and irradiation is realized using the real-time dynamic planning system Oncentra Prostate. All pre-plans and all the inverse optimization of clinical plans were based on HIPO using the modulation restriction option. The patient body/OARs/catheters movement are generated from the clinical, pre- and post- irradiation plans and its influence on DVH-, COIN and radiobiological parameters of PTV and OARs are calculated and presented.
Results: It is observed a slight decrease of treatment plan quality with increase of time between the clinical image set acquisition and the patient irradiation. Also, we show that the patient body movement/anatomy alteration and/or catheters dislocation results in decreased plan quality; change of values of the COIN, DVH- and radiobiological parameters.
Conclusion: The measured mean shift of anatomy and needles (beams) is as low as 1.0mm that is lower by an order of magnitude to values known from external beam irradiation. For high modulated plans as those in HDR Brachytherapy such small shifts result in dosimetric changes which are in general lower than 5%. Our results demonstrate that quality assurance procedures have to be clinically implemented to guarantee anatomy and implant stability of the order of 1mm. This can only be realized without any manipulation of the implant and anatomy as done, for instance in the case of removing the US-probe before treatment delivery or moving the patient from one bed to another for the irradiation purposes
|
|---|
