Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms
Stochastic regularized methods are quite advantageous in Super-Resolution (SR) image reconstruction problems. In the particular techniques the SR problem is formulated by means of two terms, the data-fidelity term and the regularization term. The present work examines the effect of each one of these...
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | , |
---|---|
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
Μορφή: | Journal (paper) |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
2011
|
Θέματα: | |
Διαθέσιμο Online: | http://hdl.handle.net/10889/4841 |
id |
nemertes-10889-4841 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
nemertes-10889-48412022-09-05T04:59:35Z Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms Panagiotopoulou, Antigoni Anastassopoulos, Vassilis Παναγιωτοπούλου, Αντιγόνη Αναστασόπουλος, Βασίλειος Super-resolution Data-fidelity Regularization Noisy frames Method selection Stochastic regularized methods are quite advantageous in Super-Resolution (SR) image reconstruction problems. In the particular techniques the SR problem is formulated by means of two terms, the data-fidelity term and the regularization term. The present work examines the effect of each one of these terms on the SR reconstruction result with respect to the presence or absence of noise in the Low-Resolution (LR) frames. Experimentation is carried out with the widely employed L2, L1, Huber and Lorentzian estimators for the data-fidelity term. The Tikhonov and Bilateral (B) Total Variation (TV) techniques are employed for the regularization term. The extracted conclusions can, in practice, help to select an effective SR method for a given sequence of LR frames. Thus, in case that the potential methods present common data-fidelity or regularization term, and frames are noiseless, the method which employs the most robust regularization or data-fidelity term should be used. Otherwise, experimental conclusions regarding performance ranking vary with the presence of noise in frames, the noise model as well as the difference in robustness of efficiency between the rival terms. Estimators employed for the data-fidelity term or regularizations stand for the rival terms. 2011-12-08T09:38:22Z 2011-12-08T09:38:22Z 2010-12-07 2011-12-08 Journal (paper) http://hdl.handle.net/10889/4841 en http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2010.11.005 NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Information Fusion. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Information Fusion, in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2010.11.005. application/pdf Information Fusion |
institution |
UPatras |
collection |
Nemertes |
language |
English |
topic |
Super-resolution Data-fidelity Regularization Noisy frames Method selection |
spellingShingle |
Super-resolution Data-fidelity Regularization Noisy frames Method selection Panagiotopoulou, Antigoni Anastassopoulos, Vassilis Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms |
description |
Stochastic regularized methods are quite advantageous in Super-Resolution (SR) image reconstruction problems. In the particular techniques the SR problem is formulated by means of two terms, the data-fidelity term and the regularization term. The present work examines the effect of each one of these terms on the SR reconstruction result with respect to the presence or absence of noise in the Low-Resolution (LR) frames. Experimentation is carried out with the widely employed L2, L1, Huber and Lorentzian estimators for the data-fidelity term. The Tikhonov and Bilateral (B) Total Variation (TV) techniques are employed for the regularization term. The extracted conclusions can, in practice, help to select an effective SR method for a given sequence of LR frames. Thus, in case that the potential methods present common data-fidelity or regularization term, and frames are noiseless, the method which employs the most robust regularization or data-fidelity term should be used. Otherwise, experimental conclusions regarding performance ranking vary with the presence of noise in frames, the noise model as well as the difference in robustness of efficiency between the rival terms. Estimators employed for the data-fidelity term or regularizations stand for the rival terms. |
author2 |
Παναγιωτοπούλου, Αντιγόνη |
author_facet |
Παναγιωτοπούλου, Αντιγόνη Panagiotopoulou, Antigoni Anastassopoulos, Vassilis |
format |
Journal (paper) |
author |
Panagiotopoulou, Antigoni Anastassopoulos, Vassilis |
author_sort |
Panagiotopoulou, Antigoni |
title |
Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms |
title_short |
Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms |
title_full |
Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms |
title_fullStr |
Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: Trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms |
title_sort |
super-resolution image reconstruction techniques: trade-offs between the data-fidelity and regularization terms |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10889/4841 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT panagiotopoulouantigoni superresolutionimagereconstructiontechniquestradeoffsbetweenthedatafidelityandregularizationterms AT anastassopoulosvassilis superresolutionimagereconstructiontechniquestradeoffsbetweenthedatafidelityandregularizationterms |
_version_ |
1771297129683222528 |