| Περίληψη: | Breast cancer is a major global health problem and the most common form of cancer among women. Major advances in the technologies of imaging provide improved detection and sensitivity with fewer unnecessary biopsies. Commonly used imaging modalities include mammography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), scintimammography, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET).
The current study is focused on breast MRI imaging, especially one of the most promising recent techniques, i.e. the Diffusion Weighted Imaging breast MRI (DWI).
DWI is an unenhanced MRI technique, based on volume sequences on various b values (the b value identifies the measurement's sensitivity to diffusion and determines the strength and duration of the diffusion gradients) measuring the mobility of water molecules (Brownian motion) in vivo (in tissues) and provides different and potentially complementary information to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) technique.
As DWI based on the diffusive properties of water molecules, reflects their random motion resulting from thermal agitation. Water diffusion on breast can be quantified by measuring the mean diffusivity, which is the average of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC). The ADC can be calculated by making measurements at a low b factor, b1, and a higher b factor, b2. DWI allows the mapping of the diffusion process of molecules by the ADC map. ADC maps are calculated by collecting images with at least 2 different values, b1 and b2, of the b factor. The ADC map is a parametric image whose color scale or gray scale represents the ADC values of the voxels and is usually generated by proprietary or in house software.
DWI apart from the 3D anatomical information, provides a noninvasive investigation of tissue vascularity, a novel contrast mechanism in MRI and has a high sensitivity in the detection of changes in the local biologic environment due to a pathologic process. Therefore, in addition to contrast enhancement-based characterization (DCE-MRI), measurement of the motion of water molecules in DWI provides an additional feature for lesion characterization that may further increase the specificity of MRI for classifying breast lesions.
The diagnostic task that the current study deals with, accounts for the diagnosis of mass-like lesions in Diffusion Weighed Magnetic Resonance Imaging, based on low
ADC values compared to high once in case of benign versus normal tissue. The hypothesis is that diffusivity of water molecules is restricted in environments of high cellularity, intracellular and extracellular edema, high viscosity, and fibrosis, such as malignant tumors, because these conditions become barriers to the movement of water molecules. Therefore, most of breast cancers show low ADC values compared with benign and normal tissue.
Many studies have revealed the usefulness of ADC values in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions; however, the clinical effect remains limited because of the substantial overlap between benign and malignant lesions, which presents challenges for implementing a useful diagnostic ADC threshold. The majority of studies, similar to the current study, determined optimal cutoff levels of the ADC value between malignant and benign lesions by using ROC analysis, and ranged from 0.90 to 1.76 × 10-3 mm2/s while the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 63% to 100% and 46% to 97%, respectively. In addition, the methods for measuring ADC differ among reported studies, with the most representative method being the mean value of ADC (mean ± standard deviation) over a Region Of Interest representative of the breast lesion.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of histogram characteristics of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient-ADC) to differentiate malignant from benign breast lesions in breast DWI. To this end the ADC maps of representative lesion ROIs were subjected to first order statistics analysis by calculating five first order textural features: Mean value, Standard Deviation, Kurtosis, Skewness and Entropy. This approach is intended to offer a more complete assessment of tumor texture and heterogeneity.
The dataset analyzed is comprised of 92 histologically verified breast lesions, originating from 69 women with mammographically and/or ultrasonographically detected or palpable findings. Histology revealed 53 malignant lesions originating from 45 women and 39 benign lesions originating from 26 women. All of the breast MR examinations were performed with a 3T MR scanner, for b= 0, 900 s/mm2. Diagnostic performances of these parameters were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
The mean of ADC of benign lesions [(1.470 ± 0.342) × 10-3 mm2/s] was found to be significantly higher than that of malignant tumours, [(0.965 ± 0.268) × 10-3 mm2/s, (p<0.00001)]. The standard deviation of ADC of benign lesions [(0.184 ± 0.999) × 10-3 mm2/s] was not significantly different from that of malignant tumours, [(0.192 ±
0.151) × 10-3 mm2/s, (p=0.6581)]. The skewness of ADC of benign [-0.303 ± 0.584] was significantly different than that of malignant tumours, 0.210 ± 0.725. (p = 0.0008)]. The kurtosis of ADC of benign [3.003 ± 1.065] was not significantly different from that of malignant tumours, [3.337 ± 1.334. (p=0.0987)]. The entropy of ADC of benign [4.794 ± 0.665] was significantly lower than that of malignant tumours, [5.569 ± 0.649, (p<0.00001)]
The corresponding area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve was: 0.862 ± 0.042 (95% confidence interval: 0.754, 0.925) for mean of ADC, 0.705 ± 0.054 (95% confidence interval: 0.589, 0.800) for skeweness of ADC, 0.800 ± 0.046 (95% confidence interval: 0.691, 0.874) for entropy of ADC, resulting a good diagnostic performance of DWI for these parameters. On the other hand, an AUC of 0.527 ± 0.063 (95% confidence interval: 0.393, 0.640) and 0.601 ± 0.061 (95% confidence interval: 0.470, 0.707) for Standard deviation and kurtosis respectively, suggests a degree of overlap in ADC values between benign and malignant tumors.
In an effort to identify optimal threshold values for differentiating benign versus malignant lesions these were selected to correspond to the points of highest accuracy of the ROC curves. In our study, we obtained two threshold values of mean ADC, both with an accuracy of 83.15%: 1.21 x 10-3 mm2/s with a sensitivity of 86.27% and specificity of 78.95%; and 1.32 x 10-3 mm2/s with a sensitivity of 92.16% and specificity of 71.05%. The threshold value of skeweness was -0.06 with an accuracy of 68.54%, a sensitivity of 66.03% and specificity of 66.67%. Finally, we found two threshold values of entropy, both with an accuracy of 76.40%: 5.17 with a sensitivity of 75.47% and specificity of 71.80%; and 5.21 with a sensitivity of 73.59% and specificity of 74.36%.
In conclusion, results of the current study suggest the contribution of texture analysis methods in Diffusion-weighted MRI breast imaging for the quantification of tissue heterogeneity, providing important information for breast cancer diagnosis. Histogram analysis of ADC values in breast cancer has potential for differentiating benign and malignant tumors, providing information about the entire tumor. The mean, skewness and entropy of ADC are valuable parameters that are correlated with pathologic characterization of breast tumors. These 3 ADC parameters significantly elevated the quantitative diagnostic performance of breast DWI and would be effective parameters in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions.
Finally, future efforts will also focus on investigating the correlation of extracted texture features with histopathological findings, in order to verify the potential of the proposed texture analysis of ADC map in providing non-invasive prognostic factors of breast cancer.
|
|---|
