Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world

In this article I argue that the considerable contribution of cheating to the development of the narrative of Homer’s Odyssey (ca. 700 BCE) is the consequence of the epic’s chaotic and precipitous start – so precipitous in fact that the actorial motivation and the narratorial motivation (De Jong 200...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Blankenborg, Ronald
Μορφή: Online
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Centre for the Study of Myth and Religion in Greek and Roman Antiquity 2018
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://pasithee.library.upatras.gr/electra/article/view/2930
id oai:ojs.pasithee.library.upatras.gr:article-2930
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.pasithee.library.upatras.gr:article-29302019-09-11T07:11:54Z Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world Blankenborg, Ronald In this article I argue that the considerable contribution of cheating to the development of the narrative of Homer’s Odyssey (ca. 700 BCE) is the consequence of the epic’s chaotic and precipitous start – so precipitous in fact that the actorial motivation and the narratorial motivation (De Jong 2004) are not automatically in sync. Faced with the sudden – and for many characters involved: unexpected – challenge to account for the choices made over the past ten years since the fall and destruction of Troy, the Odyssey’s main characters do not always justify their actions with plausible or coherent arguments. Especially Odysseus appears to cheat while mixing truth with falsehood as he introduces the reasons and the circumstances of his unexpected and rather belated return home. His wife Penelope equally struggles justifying her deeds: she appears to have been cheating, but her acts turn out to have been well-considered. Telemachus, their son, suffers from his inability to mask his true intentions (Heitman 2005); he still has to master what is presented as a highly valued skill in the Odyssey, the art of cheating. It is in fact, I will argue, so highly valued that all narrators, including Homer himself, allow for cheating and lying in order to bring the precipitously started Odyssey to a proper conclusion. Centre for the Study of Myth and Religion in Greek and Roman Antiquity 2018-11-23 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://pasithee.library.upatras.gr/electra/article/view/2930 10.26220/ele.2930 Electra; No 4 (2018): Cheating in ancient myth; 1-34 Electra; No 4 (2018): Cheating in ancient myth; 1-34 1792-605X 1792-605X eng https://pasithee.library.upatras.gr/electra/article/view/2930/3232
institution UPatras
collection Pasithee
language English
topic Medicine, Plants, Vegetables, Fruits, Disease, Magic, Religion
Greek mythology
Greek mythology
Oresteia, Agamemnon, Clytemnestra
disbelief, iamata, epigraphic evidence, literary evidence, divine punishment, incubation
Greek mythology
Greek mythology
Iphigénie, Iphigénie en Tauride, sacrifice, protéleia, prémices
Asclepius, Justin martyr, Athenagoras, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Contra Celsum, euhemerism
Hercules; Steve Moore; comics
myth;counterfeit;origami; repetition
Agamemnon, hero, Kassandra, Amyklai, Zeus
Asclepius, testimonials, medical treatment, Aristides
Heracles’ private life; Love; Family; Man /woman; Mythic parallels
greek mythology
Agamemnon, history, rhetoric, politics
Ηρακλής; Γέλα; Ακράγας; Ρόδος; Κρήτη
Snake, ambiguity, health in antiquity, healing cult, symbolism, ancient medicine, snake imagery, manipulation
Greek mythology
spellingShingle Medicine, Plants, Vegetables, Fruits, Disease, Magic, Religion
Greek mythology
Greek mythology
Oresteia, Agamemnon, Clytemnestra
disbelief, iamata, epigraphic evidence, literary evidence, divine punishment, incubation
Greek mythology
Greek mythology
Iphigénie, Iphigénie en Tauride, sacrifice, protéleia, prémices
Asclepius, Justin martyr, Athenagoras, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Contra Celsum, euhemerism
Hercules; Steve Moore; comics
myth;counterfeit;origami; repetition
Agamemnon, hero, Kassandra, Amyklai, Zeus
Asclepius, testimonials, medical treatment, Aristides
Heracles’ private life; Love; Family; Man /woman; Mythic parallels
greek mythology
Agamemnon, history, rhetoric, politics
Ηρακλής; Γέλα; Ακράγας; Ρόδος; Κρήτη
Snake, ambiguity, health in antiquity, healing cult, symbolism, ancient medicine, snake imagery, manipulation
Greek mythology
Blankenborg, Ronald
Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world
topic_facet Medicine, Plants, Vegetables, Fruits, Disease, Magic, Religion
Greek mythology
Greek mythology
Oresteia, Agamemnon, Clytemnestra
disbelief, iamata, epigraphic evidence, literary evidence, divine punishment, incubation
Greek mythology
Greek mythology
Iphigénie, Iphigénie en Tauride, sacrifice, protéleia, prémices
Asclepius, Justin martyr, Athenagoras, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Contra Celsum, euhemerism
Hercules; Steve Moore; comics
myth;counterfeit;origami; repetition
Agamemnon, hero, Kassandra, Amyklai, Zeus
Asclepius, testimonials, medical treatment, Aristides
Heracles’ private life; Love; Family; Man /woman; Mythic parallels
greek mythology
Agamemnon, history, rhetoric, politics
Ηρακλής; Γέλα; Ακράγας; Ρόδος; Κρήτη
Snake, ambiguity, health in antiquity, healing cult, symbolism, ancient medicine, snake imagery, manipulation
Greek mythology
format Online
author Blankenborg, Ronald
author_facet Blankenborg, Ronald
author_sort Blankenborg, Ronald
title Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world
title_short Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world
title_full Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world
title_fullStr Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world
title_full_unstemmed Cheating your way back: Odysseus' return to a real world
title_sort cheating your way back: odysseus' return to a real world
description In this article I argue that the considerable contribution of cheating to the development of the narrative of Homer’s Odyssey (ca. 700 BCE) is the consequence of the epic’s chaotic and precipitous start – so precipitous in fact that the actorial motivation and the narratorial motivation (De Jong 2004) are not automatically in sync. Faced with the sudden – and for many characters involved: unexpected – challenge to account for the choices made over the past ten years since the fall and destruction of Troy, the Odyssey’s main characters do not always justify their actions with plausible or coherent arguments. Especially Odysseus appears to cheat while mixing truth with falsehood as he introduces the reasons and the circumstances of his unexpected and rather belated return home. His wife Penelope equally struggles justifying her deeds: she appears to have been cheating, but her acts turn out to have been well-considered. Telemachus, their son, suffers from his inability to mask his true intentions (Heitman 2005); he still has to master what is presented as a highly valued skill in the Odyssey, the art of cheating. It is in fact, I will argue, so highly valued that all narrators, including Homer himself, allow for cheating and lying in order to bring the precipitously started Odyssey to a proper conclusion.
publisher Centre for the Study of Myth and Religion in Greek and Roman Antiquity
publishDate 2018
url https://pasithee.library.upatras.gr/electra/article/view/2930
work_keys_str_mv AT blankenborgronald cheatingyourwaybackodysseusreturntoarealworld
_version_ 1771298468021665792