| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-230972024-03-22T19:23:38Z Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? Gless, Sabine Richter, Thomas Law Private international law Conflict of laws International criminal law Criminal law Criminal justice, Administration of Social justice Human rights thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBZ Public international law: criminal law thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences::LNFB Criminal justice law This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved. ; 2020-03-18 13:36:15 2020-04-01T09:03:23Z 2020-04-01T09:03:23Z 2019 book 1007061 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23097 eng Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice application/pdf n/a 1007061.pdf https://www.springer.com/9783030125202 Springer Nature 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 6c6992af-b843-4f46-859c-f6e9998e40d5 07f61e34-5b96-49f0-9860-c87dd8228f26 Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) 380 Cham 10BP12_184596 Open Access Books Securing a fair trial through excluding evidence? A comparative perspective Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Swiss National Science Foundation open access
|
| description |
This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved. ;
|
