id |
oapen-20.500.12657-23693
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-236932024-03-22T19:23:04Z Chapter Mapping to prosody Güneş, Güliz Çöltekin, Çağrı Schneider, Stefan Glikman, Julie Avanzi, Mathieu Sentence-medial parentheticals prosodic constituency Turkish prosodic isolation boundary cues recursive prosodic category types pragmatic isolation syntax-prosody mapping thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFF Historical and comparative linguistics thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFH Phonetics, phonology thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFK Grammar, syntax and morphology This study investigates the prosody of different types of sentence-medial parentheticals in Turkish. The results of a production experiment show that clausal parentheticals exhibit cues similar to intonation phrase-level cues such as pre-boundary lengthening of the final syllable, longer pauses, and higher final rise. Phrasal parentheticals, on the other hand, exhibit cues similar to phonological phrase-level cues on both edges. From these results, we conclude that clausal parentheticals are prosodically isolated, supporting the theories of syntax-prosody mapping, while XP parentheticals are prosodically integrated, partially supporting syntax-prosody mapping theories. The latter result supports theories that assume XP-to-phonological phrase matching, but not those that predict the prosodic isolation with all parentheticals. In this respect, Turkish marks constituent-to-constituent matching of syntax and prosody more faithfully than the mapping of syntactic isolation. Additionally, mapping of pragmatic information is highly favoured in Turkish. Specifically, pragmatically isolated parentheticals such as vocatives or interjections are prosodically isolated, regardless of their syntactic make-up. We discuss the prosodic structure of Turkish parentheticals and propose a representation that favours the recursion of certain prosodic category types. 2019-11-20 23:55 2020-01-07 16:47:06 2020-04-01T09:26:12Z 2020-04-01T09:26:12Z 2015 chapter 1006451 OCN: 1135848979 9783110376036; 9783110394191 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23693 eng application/pdf n/a 42_[9783110376142 - Parenthetical Verbs] Mapping.pdf De Gruyter Parenthetical Verbs 10.1515/9783110376142-012 10.1515/9783110376142-012 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 70d515eb-5eb2-48ba-9e04-d010ce3db9cd 7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79 9783110376036; 9783110394191 European Research Council (ERC) Berlin/Boston 263836 FP7 Ideas: European Research Council FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
This study investigates the prosody of different types of sentence-medial parentheticals in Turkish. The results of a production experiment show that clausal parentheticals exhibit cues similar to intonation phrase-level cues such as pre-boundary lengthening of the final syllable, longer pauses, and higher final rise. Phrasal parentheticals, on the other hand, exhibit cues similar to phonological phrase-level cues on both edges. From these results, we conclude that clausal parentheticals are prosodically isolated, supporting the theories of syntax-prosody mapping, while XP parentheticals are prosodically integrated, partially supporting syntax-prosody mapping theories. The latter result supports theories that assume XP-to-phonological phrase matching, but not those that predict the prosodic isolation with all parentheticals. In this respect, Turkish marks constituent-to-constituent matching of syntax and prosody more faithfully than the mapping of syntactic isolation. Additionally, mapping of pragmatic information is highly favoured in Turkish. Specifically, pragmatically isolated parentheticals such as vocatives or interjections are prosodically isolated, regardless of their syntactic make-up. We discuss the prosodic structure of Turkish parentheticals and propose a representation that favours the recursion of certain prosodic category types.
|
title |
42_[9783110376142 - Parenthetical Verbs] Mapping.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
42_[9783110376142 - Parenthetical Verbs] Mapping.pdf
|
title_short |
42_[9783110376142 - Parenthetical Verbs] Mapping.pdf
|
title_full |
42_[9783110376142 - Parenthetical Verbs] Mapping.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
42_[9783110376142 - Parenthetical Verbs] Mapping.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
42_[9783110376142 - Parenthetical Verbs] Mapping.pdf
|
title_sort |
42_[9783110376142 - parenthetical verbs] mapping.pdf
|
publisher |
De Gruyter
|
publishDate |
2019
|
_version_ |
1799945243652521984
|