id |
oapen-20.500.12657-23698
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-236982024-03-22T19:23:04Z Chapter Wittgenstein as a Commentator on the Psychology and Anthropology of Colour Kusch, Martin Gierlinger, Frederik A. Riegelnik, Štefan 20th-Century Philosophy Aesthetics Studies on Colour thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800 thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTN Philosophy: aesthetics As is well known, Wittgenstein had a life-long interest in the philosophy of colour, from the Tractatus all the way to the last notebooks that were posthumously published as two books, Remarks on Colour and On Certainty. Moreover, Wittgenstein’s various reflections of the perception and classification of colours have already been analyzed by a number of influential interpreters. These interpreters have often sought to illuminate Wittgenstein’s views by relating them to other, earlier treatments of phenomena of colour, for example those written by Georg Christoph Lichtenberg (1742-1799), Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832), Philipp Otto Runge (1777-1810), Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), Franz Clemens Brentano (1838-1917), or David Katz (1884-1953).¹One aim of my paper is to add a new “foil” to this list: I want to make plausible that a number of Wittgenstein’s remarks on colour are responses to late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century British and American work on the psychology and anthropology of colour. I am not the first to put forward this idea – it is mentioned in a recent paper by the historian of science Simon Schaffer (2010: 279). But Schaffer’s comment is brief, and he provides only little evidence. So there remains plenty for me to do. I have a second aim, too. I want to argue that Wittgenstein’s comments are still of systematic interest today. The link between the historical thesis and the systematic concern is established by the fact that a very influential body of contemporary work in the anthropology of colour is strongly influenced by the early British work. Presumably, if Wittgenstein’s comments work as criticism of the latter, it will also weaken the appeal of the former. My paper falls into three parts. Section 2 gives an introduction to the relevant psychological and anthropological studies. Section 3 situates some of Wittgenstein’s comments vis-à-vis these investigations. Chapter 4 summarises my observations. 2019-11-19 23:55 2020-01-07 16:47:06 2020-04-01T09:26:19Z 2020-04-01T09:26:19Z 2014 chapter 1006446 OCN: 1135844990 9783110554809; 9783110383355 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23698 eng application/pdf n/a 79_[9783110351101 - Wittgenstein] Wittgenstein.pdf De Gruyter Wittgenstein on Colour 10.1515/9783110351101.93 10.1515/9783110351101.93 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 27df63f1-ad83-4b41-8675-dff13b3d87a8 7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79 9783110554809; 9783110383355 European Research Council (ERC) Berlin/Boston 339382 FP7 Ideas: European Research Council FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
As is well known, Wittgenstein had a life-long interest in the philosophy of colour, from the Tractatus all the way to the last notebooks that were posthumously published as two books, Remarks on Colour and On Certainty. Moreover, Wittgenstein’s various reflections of the perception and classification of colours have already been analyzed by a number of influential interpreters. These interpreters have often sought to illuminate Wittgenstein’s views by relating them to other, earlier treatments of phenomena of colour, for example those written by Georg Christoph Lichtenberg (1742-1799), Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832), Philipp Otto Runge (1777-1810), Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), Franz Clemens Brentano (1838-1917), or David Katz (1884-1953).¹One aim of my paper is to add a new “foil” to this list: I want to make plausible that a number of Wittgenstein’s remarks on colour are responses to late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century British and American work on the psychology and anthropology of colour. I am not the first to put forward this idea – it is mentioned in a recent paper by the historian of science Simon Schaffer (2010: 279). But Schaffer’s comment is brief, and he provides only little evidence. So there remains plenty for me to do. I have a second aim, too. I want to argue that Wittgenstein’s comments are still of systematic interest today. The link between the historical thesis and the systematic concern is established by the fact that a very influential body of contemporary work in the anthropology of colour is strongly influenced by the early British work. Presumably, if Wittgenstein’s comments work as criticism of the latter, it will also weaken the appeal of the former. My paper falls into three parts. Section 2 gives an introduction to the relevant psychological and anthropological studies. Section 3 situates some of Wittgenstein’s comments vis-à-vis these investigations. Chapter 4 summarises my observations.
|
title |
79_[9783110351101 - Wittgenstein] Wittgenstein.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
79_[9783110351101 - Wittgenstein] Wittgenstein.pdf
|
title_short |
79_[9783110351101 - Wittgenstein] Wittgenstein.pdf
|
title_full |
79_[9783110351101 - Wittgenstein] Wittgenstein.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
79_[9783110351101 - Wittgenstein] Wittgenstein.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
79_[9783110351101 - Wittgenstein] Wittgenstein.pdf
|
title_sort |
79_[9783110351101 - wittgenstein] wittgenstein.pdf
|
publisher |
De Gruyter
|
publishDate |
2019
|
_version_ |
1799945261702709248
|