16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf

As Anna Siewierska notes (2004: 8) ‘the universality of person as a grammatical category is sometimes called into question.’ And indeed, in some languages, an interesting minority, it is not obvious whether there is a person feature as part of the morphosyntactic system or not. We find conflicting a...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: De Gruyter 2019
id oapen-20.500.12657-23705
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-237052024-03-22T19:23:04Z Chapter Person by other means Baerman, Matthew Corbett, Greville G. Bakker, Dik Haspelmath, Martin Linguistic Typology Person and Pronouns Grammatical Alignment Grammatical Voice thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFA Philosophy of language As Anna Siewierska notes (2004: 8) ‘the universality of person as a grammatical category is sometimes called into question.’ And indeed, in some languages, an interesting minority, it is not obvious whether there is a person feature as part of the morphosyntactic system or not. We find conflicting analyses of individual languages, and there are instances of intriguingly similar systems being anal-ysed differently, because of distinct traditions. Cross-linguistically there is a rela-tively short list of features which are genuinely morphosyntactic; that is, they are referred to by rules of syntax and by rules of inflectional morphology. Person is often such a feature, being referred to by rules of agreement, and being relevant to verbal inflection. Such morphosyntactic features are to be distinguished from purely morphological features, such as inflectional class, which allow general-izations across lexemes but which are not accessible to rules of syntax. While languages in which person is straightforwardly a morphosyntactic feature are numerous and well-known, we are concerned here with languages where its expression is bound up with that of another feature, namely gender, so that its status is far from certain. We consider several such instances, from different lin-guistic and geographical areas. 2019-11-19 23:55 2020-01-07 16:47:06 2020-04-01T09:26:27Z 2020-04-01T09:26:27Z 2013 chapter 1006439 OCN: 1135848315 9783110331035 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23705 eng application/pdf n/a 16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf De Gruyter Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska 10.1515/9783110331127.1 10.1515/9783110331127.1 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 68e11b33-3fb7-44cd-8022-61566ffc2937 7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79 9783110331035 European Research Council (ERC) Berlin/Boston 230268 FP7 Ideas: European Research Council FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description As Anna Siewierska notes (2004: 8) ‘the universality of person as a grammatical category is sometimes called into question.’ And indeed, in some languages, an interesting minority, it is not obvious whether there is a person feature as part of the morphosyntactic system or not. We find conflicting analyses of individual languages, and there are instances of intriguingly similar systems being anal-ysed differently, because of distinct traditions. Cross-linguistically there is a rela-tively short list of features which are genuinely morphosyntactic; that is, they are referred to by rules of syntax and by rules of inflectional morphology. Person is often such a feature, being referred to by rules of agreement, and being relevant to verbal inflection. Such morphosyntactic features are to be distinguished from purely morphological features, such as inflectional class, which allow general-izations across lexemes but which are not accessible to rules of syntax. While languages in which person is straightforwardly a morphosyntactic feature are numerous and well-known, we are concerned here with languages where its expression is bound up with that of another feature, namely gender, so that its status is far from certain. We consider several such instances, from different lin-guistic and geographical areas.
title 16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf
spellingShingle 16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf
title_short 16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf
title_full 16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf
title_fullStr 16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 16_[9783110331127 - Languages] Person.pdf
title_sort 16_[9783110331127 - languages] person.pdf
publisher De Gruyter
publishDate 2019
_version_ 1799945270218194944