id |
oapen-20.500.12657-23707
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-237072024-03-22T19:23:04Z Chapter Where Alice fell into Verkerk, Annemarie Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt Wälchli, Bernhard Variation dialectology linguistic typology thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFB Sociolinguistics thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFF Historical and comparative linguistics::CFFD Dialect, slang and jargon thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFX Computational and corpus linguistics The way in which different languages encode motion has been an important topic of investigation in the last few decades. As more data from typologically different languages has become available, the strict dichotomy between satellite-framed and verb-framed languages proposed by Talmy (1985, 1991, 2000) has come under fire (Croft et al. 2010; Beavers et al. 2010). Drawing on a parallel corpus with data from sixteen Indo-European languages, this paper investigates the validity of these categories. I employ aggregation measures to present visual representations of the relationships between the languages in order to show that although some languages fit well into the category of “satellite-framed” or “verb-framed” language, others clearly do not. In line with these and other results, I propose that the Talmyan classifications only have limited use, and motion research should take into account all motion construction types when describing motion encoding. 2019-11-19 23:55 2020-01-07 16:47:06 2020-04-01T09:26:29Z 2020-04-01T09:26:29Z 2014 chapter 1006437 OCN: 1135847588 9783110317398; 9783110372540 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23707 eng application/pdf n/a 44_[9783110317558 - Aggregating] Where.pdf De Gruyter Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech 10.1515/9783110317558.324 10.1515/9783110317558.324 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 8c961401-f59b-4c9b-8c40-01baa647bba6 7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79 9783110317398; 9783110372540 European Research Council (ERC) Berlin/Boston 268744 FP7 Ideas: European Research Council FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
The way in which different languages encode motion has been an important topic of investigation in the last few decades. As more data from typologically different languages has become available, the strict dichotomy between satellite-framed and verb-framed languages proposed by Talmy (1985, 1991, 2000) has come under fire (Croft et al. 2010; Beavers et al. 2010). Drawing on a parallel corpus with data from sixteen Indo-European languages, this paper investigates the validity of these categories. I employ aggregation measures to present visual representations of the relationships between the languages in order to show that although some languages fit well into the category of “satellite-framed” or “verb-framed” language, others clearly do not. In line with these and other results, I propose that the Talmyan classifications only have limited use, and motion research should take into account all motion construction types when describing motion encoding.
|
title |
44_[9783110317558 - Aggregating] Where.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
44_[9783110317558 - Aggregating] Where.pdf
|
title_short |
44_[9783110317558 - Aggregating] Where.pdf
|
title_full |
44_[9783110317558 - Aggregating] Where.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
44_[9783110317558 - Aggregating] Where.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
44_[9783110317558 - Aggregating] Where.pdf
|
title_sort |
44_[9783110317558 - aggregating] where.pdf
|
publisher |
De Gruyter
|
publishDate |
2019
|
_version_ |
1799945244489285632
|