| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-243442024-03-22T19:23:22Z The Politics of Affective Societies Kahl, Antje Lehmann, Hauke Lüthjohann, Matthias Oberkrome, Friederike Roth, Hans Scheidecker, Gabriel Thonhauser, Gerhard Ural, Nur Yasemin Wahba, Dina Walter-Jochum, Robert Zik, M. RagipVE Diefenbach, Aletta John, Thomas Politics Affect Emotion Culture Cultural Theory Ethnology Cultural Anthropology Cultural Studies thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBC Cultural and media studies::JBCC Cultural studies Many claim that political deliberation has become exceedingly affective, and hence, destabilizing. The authors of this book revisit that assumption. While recognizing that significant changes are occurring, these authors also point out the limitations of turning to contemporary democratic theory to understand and unpack these shifts. They propose, instead, to reframe this debate by deploying the analytic framework of affective societies, which highlights how affect and emotion are present in all aspects of the social. What changes over time and place are the modes and calibrations of affective and emotional registers. With this line of thinking, the authors are able to gesture towards a new outline of the political. 2019-11-11 17:24:37 2020-04-01T09:56:16Z 2020-04-01T09:56:16Z 2019 book 1005787 OCN: 1135855571 9783837647624 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24344 eng EmotionsKulturen/ EmotionCultures application/pdf n/a 9783839447628.pdf http://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-4762-4/ Bielefeld University Press transcript Verlag - Bielefeld University Press 10.14361/9783839447628 10.14361/9783839447628 c03bf030-a9f4-472d-8c22-f28a8788e05e 9783837647624 transcript Verlag - Bielefeld University Press 7 128 Bielefeld, Germany open access
|
| description |
Many claim that political deliberation has become exceedingly affective, and hence, destabilizing. The authors of this book revisit that assumption. While recognizing that significant changes are occurring, these authors also point out the limitations of turning to contemporary democratic theory to understand and unpack these shifts. They propose, instead, to reframe this debate by deploying the analytic framework of affective societies, which highlights how affect and emotion are present in all aspects of the social. What changes over time and place are the modes and calibrations of affective and emotional registers. With this line of thinking, the authors are able to gesture towards a new outline of the political.
|
