1004633.pdf

At the end of his life, Pierre Hadot was a professor at the Collège de France — a “professor’s professor” — and he helped Michel Foucault, most famously, conceptualize ethics. Hadot devoted his career to recovering the ancient conception of philosophy, according to which the discourses of universiti...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: punctum books 2019
id oapen-20.500.12657-25462
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-254622022-07-21T14:39:57Z Solar Calendar, And Other Ways of Marking Time Bendik-Keymer, Jeremy philosophy ethics ecology memoir poetry aphorisms bic Book Industry Communication::B Biography & True Stories::BM Memoirs At the end of his life, Pierre Hadot was a professor at the Collège de France — a “professor’s professor” — and he helped Michel Foucault, most famously, conceptualize ethics. Hadot devoted his career to recovering the ancient conception of philosophy, according to which the discourses of universities are but a fragment of what philosophy is. His engagement with this theme helped Bendik-Keymer understand and develop a personal counter-culture to his academic work, a kind of original academics truer to the idea of the philosophical school Plato first developed in his Ἀκαδήµεια. But while Plato’s school developed a useful form of life, it had an ambivalent relation to democracy and to everyday people. Whereas Plato was in some ways one of the first egalitarians by merit (especially concerning women), he was also deeply classist in his categorization of intellectual potentials. He effectively thought some people were stupid by nature, having no philosophical worth. Hence the Ἀκαδήµεια existed outside the city, in practice exclusive and somewhat sequestered. To some extent, Plato’s vision of philosophy — at least as explained by Hadot — had the practical point of philosophy right, but this point still needed to be rendered thoroughly democratic in the polyphony and multiple intelligences of people. Doing so coheres with what Foucault was after in his application of Hadot. It is also what Bendik-Keymer is after — to extract what is good from original academics and make it democratic, as opposed to dumbing people down. 2019-03-26 23:55 2020-01-23 14:09:07 2020-04-01T10:40:13Z 2020-04-01T10:40:13Z 2017 book 1004633 OCN: 1048135356 9780998531830 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25462 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International 1004633.pdf punctum books 10.21983/P3.0165.1.00 10.21983/P3.0165.1.00 979dc044-00ee-4ea2-affc-b08c5bd42d13 9780998531830 ScholarLed 348 Brooklyn, NY open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description At the end of his life, Pierre Hadot was a professor at the Collège de France — a “professor’s professor” — and he helped Michel Foucault, most famously, conceptualize ethics. Hadot devoted his career to recovering the ancient conception of philosophy, according to which the discourses of universities are but a fragment of what philosophy is. His engagement with this theme helped Bendik-Keymer understand and develop a personal counter-culture to his academic work, a kind of original academics truer to the idea of the philosophical school Plato first developed in his Ἀκαδήµεια. But while Plato’s school developed a useful form of life, it had an ambivalent relation to democracy and to everyday people. Whereas Plato was in some ways one of the first egalitarians by merit (especially concerning women), he was also deeply classist in his categorization of intellectual potentials. He effectively thought some people were stupid by nature, having no philosophical worth. Hence the Ἀκαδήµεια existed outside the city, in practice exclusive and somewhat sequestered. To some extent, Plato’s vision of philosophy — at least as explained by Hadot — had the practical point of philosophy right, but this point still needed to be rendered thoroughly democratic in the polyphony and multiple intelligences of people. Doing so coheres with what Foucault was after in his application of Hadot. It is also what Bendik-Keymer is after — to extract what is good from original academics and make it democratic, as opposed to dumbing people down.
title 1004633.pdf
spellingShingle 1004633.pdf
title_short 1004633.pdf
title_full 1004633.pdf
title_fullStr 1004633.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 1004633.pdf
title_sort 1004633.pdf
publisher punctum books
publishDate 2019
_version_ 1771297471334449152