| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-282792021-11-12T16:07:49Z The lexeme in descriptive and theoretical morphology Bonami, Oliver Boyé, Gilles Dal, Georgette Giraudo, Hélène Namer, Fiammetta Linguistics After being dominant during about a century since its invention by Baudouin de Courtenay at the end of the nineteenth century, morpheme is more and more replaced by lexeme in contemporary descriptive and theoretical morphology. The notion of a lexeme is usually associated with the work of P. H. Matthews (1972, 1974), who characterizes it as a lexical entity abstracting over individual inflected words. Over the last three decades, the lexeme has become a cornerstone of much work in both inflectional morphology and word formation (or, as it is increasingly been called, lexeme formation). The papers in the present volume take stock of the descriptive and theoretical usefulness of the lexeme, but also adress many of the challenges met by classical lexeme-based theories of morphology. 2018-10-11 23:55 2020-03-10 03:00:38 2020-04-01T12:19:51Z 2020-04-01T12:19:51Z 2018-09-26 book 1001683 OCN: 1065536352 9783961101108 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28279 eng Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax application/pdf n/a 1001683.pdf Language Science Press 103602 0bad921f-3055-43b9-a9f1-ea5b2d949173 b818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9 9783961101108 Knowledge Unlatched (KU) Berlin 103602 Language Science Press 2018 - 2020 Knowledge Unlatched open access
|
| description |
After being dominant during about a century since its invention by Baudouin de Courtenay at the end of the nineteenth century, morpheme is more and more replaced by lexeme in contemporary descriptive and theoretical morphology. The notion of a lexeme is usually associated with the work of P. H. Matthews (1972, 1974), who characterizes it as a lexical entity abstracting over individual inflected words. Over the last three decades, the lexeme has become a cornerstone of much work in both inflectional morphology and word formation (or, as it is increasingly been called, lexeme formation). The papers in the present volume take stock of the descriptive and theoretical usefulness of the lexeme, but also adress many of the challenges met by classical lexeme-based theories of morphology.
|