Paton_et_al.pdf
Plant names are the key to communicating and managing information about plants. This paper considers how providers of high quality technical plant name information can better meet the requirements non-botanical audiences who also rely on plant names for elements of their work. The International Plan...
Γλώσσα: | English |
---|---|
Έκδοση: |
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO)
2018
|
id |
oapen-20.500.12657-28359 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-283592021-11-12T16:11:42Z Chapter Plant Name Resources Paton, Alan Allkin, Robert Belyaeva, Irina Dauncey, Elizabeth Govaerts, Rafaël Edwards, Sarah Irving, Jason Leon, Christine Lughadha, Eimear Nic Plant names information plants bic Book Industry Communication::P Mathematics & science::PS Biology, life sciences::PST Botany & plant sciences Plant names are the key to communicating and managing information about plants. This paper considers how providers of high quality technical plant name information can better meet the requirements non-botanical audiences who also rely on plant names for elements of their work. The International Plant Name Index, World Checklist of Selected Plant Families and The Plant List are used as examples to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of plant name resources from a non-expert user’s perspective. The above resources can be thought of as botanists pushing data at audiences. Without closer engagement with users, however, there is a limit to their relevance and impact. The need to cover common names is a frequent criticism of existing resources. The Medicinal Plant Names Services (MPNS, www.kew.org/mpns) is an example of how plant name resources can be adapted to better address the needs of a non-botanical audience. Some of the major challenges are outlined and solutions suggested. 2018-10-02 10:40:51 2020-04-01T12:21:33Z 2020-04-01T12:21:33Z 2016 chapter 1001600 OCN: 1076752479 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28359 eng application/pdf n/a Paton_et_al.pdf United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) Botanists of the twenty-first century 57c014ef-7eca-4795-b95d-24b3e5f7706f eb46a41a-07a5-496c-8324-fadfb952ef1e d859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd Wellcome 10 Wellcome Trust Wellcome open access |
institution |
OAPEN |
collection |
DSpace |
language |
English |
description |
Plant names are the key to communicating and managing information about plants. This paper considers how providers of high quality technical plant name information can better meet the requirements non-botanical audiences who also rely on plant names for elements of their work. The International Plant Name Index, World Checklist of Selected Plant Families and The Plant List are used as examples to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of plant name resources from a non-expert user’s perspective. The above resources can be thought of as botanists pushing data at audiences. Without closer engagement with users, however, there is a limit to their relevance and impact. The need to cover common names is a frequent criticism of existing resources. The Medicinal Plant Names Services (MPNS, www.kew.org/mpns) is an example of how plant name resources can be adapted to better address the needs of a non-botanical audience. Some of the major challenges are outlined and solutions suggested. |
title |
Paton_et_al.pdf |
spellingShingle |
Paton_et_al.pdf |
title_short |
Paton_et_al.pdf |
title_full |
Paton_et_al.pdf |
title_fullStr |
Paton_et_al.pdf |
title_full_unstemmed |
Paton_et_al.pdf |
title_sort |
paton_et_al.pdf |
publisher |
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) |
publishDate |
2018 |
_version_ |
1771297586762743808 |