645101.pdf

In a time when conservative politicians challenge the irrefutability of scientific findings such as climate change, it is more important than ever to understand the conflict at the heart of the “religion vs. science” debates unfolding in the public sphere. In this groundbreaking work, John H. Evans...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: University of California Press 2018
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.47
id oapen-20.500.12657-30599
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-305992024-03-25T09:51:38Z Morals Not Knowledge H. Evans, John scientific knowledge religion and science evolution debates conservative protestantism moral conflict Evangelicalism God Morality Relationship between religion and science thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRA Religion: general thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology In a time when conservative politicians challenge the irrefutability of scientific findings such as climate change, it is more important than ever to understand the conflict at the heart of the “religion vs. science” debates unfolding in the public sphere. In this groundbreaking work, John H. Evans reveals that, with a few limited exceptions, even the most conservative religious Americans accept science’s ability to make factual claims about the world. However, many religious people take issue with the morality implicitly promoted by some forms of science. Using clear and engaging scholarship, Evans upends the prevailing notion that there is a fundamental conflict over the way that scientists and religious people make claims about nature and argues that only by properly understanding moral conflict between contemporary religion and science will we be able to contribute to a more productive interaction between these two great institutions. 2018-03-08 00:00:00 2020-04-01T13:02:38Z 2020-04-01T13:02:38Z 2018 book 645101 OCN: 1004576119 9780520969780 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30599 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 645101.pdf https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.47 University of California Press 10.1525/luminos.47 10.1525/luminos.47 72f3a53e-04bb-4d73-b921-22a29d903b3b 9780520969780 238 Oakland open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description In a time when conservative politicians challenge the irrefutability of scientific findings such as climate change, it is more important than ever to understand the conflict at the heart of the “religion vs. science” debates unfolding in the public sphere. In this groundbreaking work, John H. Evans reveals that, with a few limited exceptions, even the most conservative religious Americans accept science’s ability to make factual claims about the world. However, many religious people take issue with the morality implicitly promoted by some forms of science. Using clear and engaging scholarship, Evans upends the prevailing notion that there is a fundamental conflict over the way that scientists and religious people make claims about nature and argues that only by properly understanding moral conflict between contemporary religion and science will we be able to contribute to a more productive interaction between these two great institutions.
title 645101.pdf
spellingShingle 645101.pdf
title_short 645101.pdf
title_full 645101.pdf
title_fullStr 645101.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 645101.pdf
title_sort 645101.pdf
publisher University of California Press
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.47
_version_ 1799945246286544896